Abstract:1. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "Missing data that could not be temporally imputed from time series data at the same location were handled through structural expectation-maximization (Conrady and Jouffe 2015)" (page 170). The statement has been corrected to "Missing data that could not be imputed from time series data at the same location were handled through structural expectation-maximization (Conrady and Jouffe 2015)." 2. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "However, LiveCoral was the only indicator examined for the minimum mean values on the TMA curves and was not considered for the maximum mean values" (page 172). The statement has been corrected to "However, LiveCoral was the only indicator examined for the minimum mean values on the TMA curves and was not considered for the maximum mean values for stressor relationships." 3. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "Only PopBleach or ColBleach candidate models exceeded 70% total precision" (page 172). The statement has been corrected to "Only PopBleach or ColBleach candidate models exceeded 70% total precision with the exception of one LiveCoral model." 4. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "For Southeast Asia, acidification threat and LiveCoral had the highest SDE and this relationship also has the highest MI and KLD" (page 178). The statement has been corrected to "For Southeast Asia, acidification threat and LiveCoral had the highest SDE and this relationship also has the highest MI and KLD for that region." 5. All CDT abbreviations should be spelled out throughout the paragraph that starts at the end of the first column with the sentence "In Southeast Asia the lowest (negative) SDE value was for LiveCoral and CDT" (Page 178) as "coastal development threat," not abbreviated as CDT. 6. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "The DE TMA uses the model to allow other variables to covary and therefore is a useful means to assess associations with the model given the relationships that were identified by the machine learning algorithms" (page 179). The statement has been corrected to "The DE TMA uses the model to allow nonconfounder variables to covary and therefore is a useful means to assess associations with the model given the relationships that were identified by the machine learning algorithms." 7. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "The LiveCoral values were always selected for the negative linear relationships or minimum mean values for DE or TE curves" (page 180). The statement has been corrected to "The LiveCoral values were always selected for the negative linear relationships or minimum mean values for DE or TE curves for the stressor relationships." 8. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "Coastal development threat and DeadCoral had negative associations for all measures except for direct effects measures in Australia and the Indian Ocean, but these relationships were nonlinear" (page 184). The statement has been corrected to "Coastal development threat and DeadCoral had negative associations for all measures except for the Pacific and direct effects measures in the Atlantic, but these relationships were mostly nonlinear." 9. The article was initially published with the incorrect statement that "The lowest total precisions were found for LiveCoral for all data and Southeast Asia and LCI for all data" (page 185). The statement has been corrected to "The lowest total precisions for final models were found for LiveCoral for all data and Southeast Asia, and LCI for all data." 10. In Table 1, the following errors have been corrected as:(i) Arag node discretization threshold for low threat is ≥3.25 not >3.25.(ii) Node ME discretization thresholds is "Ineffective, partial, effective" under Discretization thresholds column; and "Ineffective," "Partial," and "Effective" in the footnote. -Abstract Truncated-

Assessing Coral Reef Condition Indicators for Local and Global Stressors Using Bayesian Networks

Managing Local Stressors for Coral Reef Condition and Ecosystem Services Delivery Under Climate Scenarios

Experimental Techniques to Assess Coral Physiology in situ Under Global and Local Stressors: Current Approaches and Novel Insights

Toward a Multi-stressor Theory for Coral Reefs in a Changing World

Exploring coral reef communities in Puerto Rico using Bayesian networks

Coral bleaching patterns are the outcome of complex biological and environmental networking

Coral Reef Monitoring, Reef Assessment Technologies, and Ecosystem-Based Management

An Integrated Coral Reef Ecosystem Model to Support Resource Management under a Changing Climate

Monitoring shallow coral reef exposure to environmental stressors using satellite earth observation: the reef environmental stress exposure toolbox (RESET)

Ocean Acidification and Warming Will Lower Coral Reef Resilience

Local heterogeneity of coral reef diversity and environmental stress provides opportunities for small‐scale conservation

Differential molecular biomarker expression in corals over a gradient of water quality stressors in Maunalua Bay, Hawaii

Strengthening resilience potential assessments for coral reef management

High-frequency imagery to capture coral tissue (Montipora capricornis) response to environmental stress, a pilot study

Bayesian decision-network modeling of multiple stakeholders for reef ecosystem restoration in the coral triangle

Identifying management opportunities to combat climate, land, and marine threats across less climate exposed coral reefs

Erratum: Assessing coral reef condition indicators for local and global stressors using Bayesian networks

Assessing spatiotemporal change in coral reef social-ecological systems

Multi-indicator 'state space' approach to assessing changes in shallow urban reef ecosystem health

The coral conservation crisis: interacting local and global stressors reduce reef resiliency and create challenges for conservation solutions

A biological condition gradient for Caribbean coral reefs: Part II. Numeric rules using sessile benthic organisms