Abstract:Background Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex syndrome that still portends a dismal short-term prognosis. However, in patients that survive the initial admission and are later discharged, the long-term prognosis remains ill-characterized. Aim We aimed to describe the long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes of patients surviving the index admission for CS. Methods Retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) between December 2016 and December 2022 with a diagnosis of CS. All etiologies were included and further categorized as: acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS), acute-on-chronic heart failure (HF-CS) and secondary causes [(S-CS): myocarditis, arrhythmic storm, acute pulmonary embolism, among others]. Our primary endpoint was defined as all-cause death, conditional to being discharged alive. Secondary endpoints comprised heart transplant, durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and hospital readmission during follow-up. Results A total of 208 patients were included [median age 68 years (IQR 57-80), 66% males, mean Charlson comorbidity index 4±3], of whom 52% (n=108) had AMI-CS, 27% (n=56) HF-CS and 21% (n=44) S-CS. During the index admission, mean SAPS II score was 49±18 and most patients were in SCAI-C (66%, n=137) stage. Organ support in the form of invasive mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy or temporary mechanical circulatory assist devices was necessary in 62% (n=129), 27% (n=56) and 26% (n=55) of patients, respectively. 53% of patients (n=110) survived the index admission [median CICU length of stay 8 (IQR 3-15) days; median hospital length of stay 13 (IQR 4-25) days]. At discharge, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 38±16% and 28% (n=26) of patients underwent ICD implantation. Median follow-up after discharge was 679 (IQR 373-1056) days, with 4 (4%) patients lost to follow-up. Overall mortality was 22% (n=24) and was numerically higher for AMI-CS when compared to HF-CS and S-CS (9% vs 7% vs 6% respectively, p=0.640). Secondary endpoint analysis showed that 10% (n=11) had a heart transplant, 2% (n=2) received a durable LVAD, 9% (n=10) received an ICD and 26% (n=28) were re-hospitalized during that period. Conclusions Although the long-term mortality of patients discharged alive after the index admission for CS is not overwhelming, one in every four will be readmitted and a small proportion will be eligible for advanced heart failure therapies. Healthcare strategies to improve the morbidity and mortality of many CS survivors should be devised.

The Stages of CS: Clinical and Translational Update

Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review

Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report

From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies

Trends in Cardiogenic Shock-Related Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 1999 to 2019.

Current Spectrum and Outcomes of Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the CULPRIT-SHOCK Registry and RCT

Updates on Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review

Demographic and Regional Trends of Cardiogenic Shock–Related Mortality in Young Adults in the United States, 1999 to 2019

Continuum of Preshock to Classic Cardiogenic Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry

A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock

Myocardial Recovery in Cardiogenic Shock

Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Management of cardiogenic shock: state-of-the-art

Outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock

Abstract 18298: 10-Year Trends of In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients That Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Coronary Syndrome

Anticoagulation Medications, Monitoring, and Outcomes in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Long-term outcomes of cardiogenic shock survivors: a contemporary retrospective analysis from a tertiary center

Epidemiology of cardiogenic shock using the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC) consensus definitions

Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review

[Acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: pathophysiology, clinical aspects and management strategies]

Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs with Versus Without Shock Teams.