Using quantitative trait in adults with ADHD to test predictions of dual-process theory

Emil Persson,Markus Heilig,Gustav Tinghög,Andrea J. Capusan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-76923-4
IF: 4.6
2020-11-18
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Abstract Dual-process theory is a widely utilized modelling tool in the behavioral sciences. It conceptualizes decision-making as an interaction between two types of cognitive processes, some of them fast and intuitive, others slow and reflective. We make a novel contribution to this literature by exploring differences between adults with clinically diagnosed ADHD and healthy controls for a wide range of behaviors. Given the clinical picture and nature of ADHD symptoms, we had a strong a priori reason to expect differences in intuitive vs reflective processing; and thus an unusually strong case for testing the predictions of dual-process theory. We found mixed results, with overall weaker effects than expected, except for risk taking, where individuals with ADHD showed increased domain sensitivity for gains vs losses. Some of our predictions were supported by the data but other patterns are more difficult to reconcile with theory. On balance, our results provide only limited empirical support for using dual-process theory to understand basic social and economic decision-making.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?