Abstract:1.IntroductionWith the advent of the distinctive characteristics of academic language , there has been a tremendous methods compatible with the nature of these skills (Abebe,2013). One of these methods is content and language integrated learning (CLIL). It refers to ''both content-based instruction and immersion education by virtue of its Dual focus on language and content'' (Dalton-Puffer,2011,p.182).CLIL is an approach for learning content through foreign language. It can provide opportunities for learners to use their new language skill. It is a competence-based teaching approach which refers to European education systems. The idea is to teach the subject and the language simultaneously. CLIL encourages the use of curricula which promotes the right interpersonal skills, cultural sensitivity , communication ,and language abilities (Schumacher.nd).CLIL instruction changes teacher-centered classroom into student-centered classroom. So ,it leads to more innovation and motivation than traditional instruction. Coyle(2010) claimed that CLIL is not a form of language education or subject education. In fact, it is an innovative combination of both.Marsh (2002) believed that CLIL teachers can pr ovide optimal condition for students' communication. They should be proficient enough in that content area, and they should know the foreign language very well. CLIL teachers must understand the difference between language learning and language acquisition, and they must introduce activities that link language and subject aspects.2. BackgroundKnowing other language is the best tool for openness and mobility which allows people to get to know other culture as well as experience them. It also increases the maturity, consistency and prosperity of society as a whole, giving individuals a genuine freedom.Exposure to foreign language develops affective strategies for grammatical treatment, accent opportunities and lexis acquisition (Bernabe, 2013). While human mind is open to language learning over a lifetime , the relatively recent findings have revealed the ability to learn other languages infancy is optimal. (Brewster, Ellis,& Girad,2004)Teaching and learning through foreign language is not a novel phenomenon. Interests in this matter has recently increased considerably. CLIL attracts educators and researchers, for it may be an ideal environment for achieving good proficiency in second language( Pietilla and Merikivi,2014).The term CLIL was coined by Marsh (1994). He defined CLIL as situations where subjects are taught through a forging language. It has dual- focused aims which are learning of content and learning of foreign language at the same time.In order to run CLIL method in classrooms effectively, Scott and Beadle(2014) suggested conditions for teachers. Teachers should use authentic material , should use scaffolding techniques to reduce the cognitive and linguistic load of context, should create classroom interaction to balance listening and speaking for students, should use appropriate feedback and correction in their classroom, and should use task -based language teaching method that promotes students' interaction.CLIL has three main characteristics that are needed for effective foreign language acquisition in CLIL context : exposure to input, processing of meaning, and language production (Skehan,1998). Learners should expose to input which is compatible and rich. They also process information in order to change them from input into intake,'' the part of input that learners process is called intake''(Corder,1976). So learners process compatible and relevant input to acquire language. The last characteristics is language or output production. It means learners should be able to produce language ( Bernabe, 2013).Besides of these three skills Moate(2010) investigated the social dimension of CLIL approach:From a sociocultural perspective , knowledge is understood as a historically constructed, culturally and socially contextualized entity instantiated in language. …

CEFR, CLIL, LOA, and TBLT – Synergising Goals, Methods and Assessment to Optimise Active Student Learning

Gearing Teaching and Assessment Towards CLIL: Theorizing Assessment for Learning in the Junior High School Soft CLIL Classrooms in Japan

The missing C: addressing criticality in CLIL

Differing conceptions of a teaching approach in the activity system of a Japanese university language center

Approaches to assessment in CLIL classrooms: Two case studies

A case-study of using content and language integrated learning methodology in tertiary education course design

Multimodal mediational means in assessment of processes: an argument for a hard-CLIL approach

The Impact of Content and Languaeg Integrated Learning (Clil) on Efl Learners' Reading Comprehension

The Change Laboratory in CLIL settings: Foregrounding the Voices of East Asian Students

Task-Supported EFL Instruction: Integrating Students, Teacher, and Textbook Roles in a Japanese Mainstream High School Class

Multiple Roles of Language Teachers in Supporting CLIL

DEVELOPING TERTIARY LEVEL CLIL LEARNERS’ INTERCULTURAL AWARENESS WITH A SELF-PRODUCED COURSEBOOK INTEGRATING CONTENT AND LANGUAGE

Enhancing critical thinking through active learning

Teacher-Based Assessment of Learner-led Interactions in CLIL: The Power of Cognitive Discourse Functions

Conceptualising Assessment and Learning in the CLIL Context. An Introduction

Technology-Enhanced Content and Language Integrated Learning in Chinese Tertiary English Classes: Potentials and Challenges

CLIL Model of Teaching in the College English Curriculum in China: Policies, Perceptions, and Practices

Promoting language education for sustainable development: a program effects case study in Japanese higher education

Content and language integrated learning as a means to increase students’ motivation

Exploring assessment for learning: assessment tools and approaches in Taiwanese CLIL classes

Understanding the benefits and challenges of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in English education: a literature synthesis