Abstract:Background: Cerebellar cortical molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) play essential roles in sensory information processing by the cerebellar cortex. However, recent experimental and modeling results are questioning traditional roles for molecular layer inhibition in the cerebellum.Methods and Main Results: Synaptic responses of MLIs and Purkinje cells (PCs), evoked by air-puff stimulation of the ipsilateral whisker pad were recorded from cerebellar cortex Crus II in urethane-anesthetized ICR mice by in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp recording techniques. Under current-clamp (I = 0), air-puff stimuli were found to primarily produce inhibition in PCs. In MLIs, this stimulus evoked spike firing regardless of whether they made basket-type synaptic connections or not. However, MLIs not making basket-type synaptic connections had higher rates of background activity and also generated spontaneous spike-lets. Under voltage-clamp conditions, excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded in MLIs, although the predominant response of recorded PCs was an inhibitory postsynaptic potential (IPSP). The latencies of EPSCs were similar for all MLIs, but the time course and amplitude of EPSCs varied with depth in the molecular layer. The highest amplitude, shortest duration EPSCs were recorded from MLIs deep in the molecular layer, which also made basket-type synaptic connections. Comparing MLI to PC responses, time to peak of PC IPSP was significantly slower than MLI recorded EPSCs. Blocking GABA(A) receptors uncovered larger EPSCs in PCs whose time to peak, half-width and 10-90% rising time were also significantly slower than in MLIs. Biocytin labeling indicated that the MLIs (but not PCs) are dye-coupled.Conclusions: These findings indicate that tactile face stimulation evokes rapid excitation in MLIs and inhibition occurring at later latencies in PCs in mouse cerebellar cortex Crus II. These results support previous suggestions that the lack of parallel fiber driven PC activity is due to the effect of MLI inhibition.

Cerebellar molecular layer interneurons are dispensable for cued and contextual fear conditioning

GluN2D NMDA Receptors Gate Fear Extinction Learning and Interneuron Plasticity

Cerebellar interneurons control fear memory consolidation via learning-induced HCN plasticity

Compromised Survival of Cerebellar Molecular Layer Interneurons Lacking GDNF Receptors GFRα1 or RET Impairs Normal Cerebellar Motor Learning.

Roles of Molecular Layer Interneurons in Sensory Information Processing in Mouse Cerebellar Cortex Crus Ii in Vivo

Cerebellar motor memory expression requires learned alterations to the activity of inhibitory molecular layer interneurons

Specialized connectivity of molecular layer interneuron subtypes leads to disinhibition and synchronous inhibition of cerebellar Purkinje cells

Cerebellar modulation of memory encoding in the periaqueductal grey and fear behaviour

Expression of a Form of Cerebellar Motor Memory Requires Learned Alterations to the Activity of Inhibitory Molecular Layer Interneurons

Cerebellar circuits for disinhibition and synchronous inhibition

Molecular layer disinhibition unlocks climbing-fiber-instructed motor learning in the cerebellum

Molecular layer interneurons shape the spike activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells

Bimodal modulation of L1 interneuron activity in anterior cingulate cortex during fear conditioning

Mild Deficits in Fear Learning: Evidence from Humans and Mice with Cerebellar Cortical Degeneration

Contextual Fear Learning and Extinction in the Primary Visual Cortex of Mice.

Evolving Models of Pavlovian Conditioning: Cerebellar Cortical Dynamics in Awake Behaving Mice

The cerebellum regulates fear extinction through thalamo-prefrontal cortex interactions in male mice

A thalamic-hippocampal CA1 signal for contextual fear memory suppression, extinction, and discrimination

Selective Disruption of Perineuronal Nets in Mice Lacking Crtl1 is Sufficient to Make Fear Memories Susceptible to Erasure

Cerebellar contribution to threat probability in a SCA6 mouse model

Infralimbic cortex activity is required for the expression but not the acquisition of conditioned safety