ITMIG Consensus Statement on the Use of the WHO Histological Classification of Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma: Refined Definitions, Histological Criteria, and Reporting.
Alexander Marx,Philipp Ströbel,Sunil S Badve,Lara Chalabreysse,John K C Chan,Gang Chen,Laurence de Leval,Frank Detterbeck,Nicolas Girard,Jim Huang,Michael O Kurrer,Libero Lauriola,Mirella Marino,Yoshihiro Matsuno,Thierry Jo Molina,Kiyoshi Mukai,Andrew G Nicholson,Daisuke Nonaka,Ralf Rieker,Juan Rosai,Enrico Ruffini,William D Travis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0000000000000154
2014-01-01
Abstract:INTRODUCTION:The 2004 version of the World Health Organization classification subdivides thymic epithelial tumors into A, AB, B1, B2, and B3 (and rare other) thymomas and thymic carcinomas (TC). Due to a morphological continuum between some thymoma subtypes and some morphological overlap between thymomas and TC, a variable proportion of cases may pose problems in classification, contributing to the poor interobserver reproducibility in some studies.METHODS:To overcome this problem, hematoxylin-eosin-stained and immunohistochemically processed sections of prototypic, "borderland," and "combined" thymomas and TC (n = 72) were studied by 18 pathologists at an international consensus slide workshop supported by the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group.RESULTS:Consensus was achieved on refined criteria for decision making at the A/AB borderland, the distinction between B1, B2, and B3 thymomas and the separation of B3 thymomas from TCs. "Atypical type A thymoma" is tentatively proposed as a new type A thymoma variant. New reporting strategies for tumors with more than one histological pattern are proposed.CONCLUSION:These guidelines can set the stage for reproducibility studies and the design of a clinically meaningful grading system for thymic epithelial tumors.