Abstract:Advances in Health Sciences Education (AHSE) has been at the forefront of the cognitive wave in health professions education for the past 25 years. One example is research on productive failure, a teaching strategy that asks learners to attempt to generate solutions to difficult problems before receiving instruction. This study compared the effectiveness of productive failure with indirect failure to further characterize the underpinning cognitive mechanisms of productive failure. Year one pharmacy students (N = 42) were randomly assigned to a productive failure or an indirect failure learning condition. The problem of estimating renal function based on serum creatinine was described to participants in the productive failure learning condition, who were then asked to generate a solution. Participants in the indirect failure condition learned about the same problem and were given incorrect solutions that other students had created, as well as the Cockcroft–Gault formula, and asked to compare and contrast the equations. Immediately thereafter all participants completed a series of tests designed to assess acquisition, application, and preparation for future learning (PFL). The tests were repeated after a 1-week delay. Participants in the productive failure condition outperformed those in the indirect failure condition, both on the immediate PFL assessment, and after a 1-week delay. These results emphasize the crucial role of generation in learning. When preparing novice students to learn new knowledge in the future, generating solutions to problems prior to instruction may be more effective than simply learning about someone else's mistakes. Struggle and failure are most productive when experienced personally by a learner because it requires the learner to engage in generation, which deepens conceptual understanding.

When failure fails to be productive: probing the effectiveness of productive failure for learning beyond STEM domains

Productive failure as an instructional approach to promote future learning

Exploring why we learn from productive failure: insights from the cognitive and learning sciences

Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning

Micro productive failure and the acquisition of algebraic procedural knowledge

When Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Works: Evidence for Productive Failure

Productive failure and learning through argumentation: Building a bridge between two research traditions to understand the process of peer learning

FAIL Is Not a Four-Letter Word: A Theoretical Framework for Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Approaches to Academic Challenge and Responses to Failure in STEM Learning Environments

Productive Failure as a Method for Learning about Effective Collaborative Problem Solving

Contrasting stances at the crossroads of debugging learning opportunities

What experiences constitute failures? High school students' reflections on their struggles in STEM classes

The role of productive failure in 3D printing in a middle school setting

Learning from failure: The roles of self-focused feedback, task expectations, and subsequent instruction.

Can We Teach Non-Cognitive Outcomes? A Quasi-Experimental Study of Philosophy for Children

Breaking Free: The Role of Psychological Safety and Productive Failure in Creative Pathmaking

Emotion regulation styles and the tendency to learn from academic failures

Comparing the productive failure and directive instruction for declarative safety knowledge training using virtual reality

Learning with a digital escape room game: before or after instruction?

Failure Artifact Scenarios to Understand High School Students' Growth in Troubleshooting Physical Computing Projects

Learning From Lessons Learned: Preliminary Findings From a Study of Learning From Failure

Experimenting With Teacher Professional Development: Motives and Methods