Abstract:Abstract To curtail the global warming increase to less than 2°C by 2050, the IPCC highlights Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) as a vital approach. TotalEnergies, following its ambition to become a responsible energy major, invests 10% of its R&D budget in CCUS to reduce the global process cost and help decarbonize our activities. TotalEnergies is both working to decarbonize its own assets and developing a transport and storage infrastructure in Europe, with notably Northern Lights an example of note. It is equally of interest how this transport/storage infrastructure can be of use for other sectors and as such how various full CCUS chains may emerge. This explains the interest to develop techno-economic tools to evaluate CO2 capture processes applied to a wide range of industries. CO2 that is an integral part of the manufacturing process, is particularly difficult to abate in any future scenario, and one particular industry, which is facing such a challenge is the cement sector. CCUS has been identified as a potential solution to help with this issue. The present paper outlines the outcomes of a techno-economic study evaluating CO2 capture technologies based on cement factory retrofitting. A literature review aimed at identifying the main characteristics of a typical European cement plant (capacity, process mode, pollutant composition in the flue gas...) was carried out. In this paper, a base case scenario of 90% absorption-based CO2 capture with monoethanolamine (MEA) is compared with four alternative CO2 capture approaches: –An absorption technology based on non-amine solvent.–An adsorption technology based on a Concentration Swing Adsorption process.–An oxyfuel technology derived from the R&D works performed during the CEMCAP project (European CO2 capture project).–A Calcium Looping technology with tail-end process configuration. For each of these approaches, the whole carbon capture chain has been considered: this includes flue gas pretreatment, CO2 conditioning (including compression), steam generation, and utilities. Using process simulations, engineering studies have been carried out and have provided Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as Capital Costs, Operation Costs and Global Warming Potential (primary energy consumption per ton of CO2 avoided). It enabled mapping the technologies with regards to the cost and volume of CO2 avoided, as well as providing for each of the technologies the break-even point for an eventual CO2 tax. Based on these KPIs, several facts have been highlighted: –The need to consider the whole process (including utilities, compression...) and not only the capture unit.–The development of new materials for adsorption and contactor design is already driving down costs.–The availability of waste heat can be a game-changer to implement a CO2 capture technology.–Technology comparisons are location and site-specific and cannot be taken as a basis for concept selection. TotalEnergies approach to CCUS is collaborative. With these full-scale techno-economical assessments, generated via quotations from industrial equipment providers and using Engineering, Procurement and Construction standards, this not only gives a basis for comparison, but also assists our discussions with partners to identify key technological development pathways.

Apples and Apples: A Shortcut Assessment Framework for Early‐Stage Carbon Capture and Utilization Technologies Based on Efficiency, Feasibility, and Risk

Prospective techno-economic and life cycle assessment: a review across established and emerging carbon capture, storage and utilization (CCS/CCU) technologies

Adapting the Technology Performance Level Integrated Assessment Framework to Low-TRL Technologies Within the Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Industry, Part I

A Guideline for Life Cycle Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization

Assessing Capacity to Deploy Direct Air Capture Technology at the Country Level – An Expert and Information Entropy Comparative Analysis

Making Direct Air Capture Affordable; Technology, Market and Regulatory Approaches

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

Direct Air Capture of CO2: A Key Technology for Ambitious Climate Change Mitigation

A Fair Comparison Between Five Co2 Capture Technologies

Integrated decision-making approach for sectoral low-carbon technology solutions

An analytical framework for long term policy for commercial deployment and innovation in carbon capture and sequestration technology in the United States

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) analysis of incentives and rules in a European repeated game situation

Integration of carbon emission reduction policies and technologies: Research progress on carbon capture, utilization and storage technologies

Assessing Various CO2 Utilization Technologies: A Brief Comparative Review

Energetic and Life Cycle Assessment of Direct Air Capture: A Review

A comprehensive framework for feasibility of CCUS deployment: A meta-review of literature on factors impacting CCUS deployment

Criteria for effective site selection of direct air capture and storage projects

Understanding Marginal Abatement Cost Curves in Energy-intensive Industries in China: Insights from Comparison of Different Models

Comprehensive technology and economic evaluation based on the promotion of large-scale carbon capture and storage demonstration projects

Techno-economic Analysis of Integrated Carbon Capture and Utilisation Compared with Carbon Capture and Utilisation with Syngas Production

A comprehensive evaluation model for full-chain CCUS performance based on the analytic hierarchy process method