Abstract:The importance of design as a source of value creation has been studied for decades. In the late 90s, however, a specific approach in the practice of design achieved a rapid diffusion across organizations: Design Thinking. This is a formal method for creative problem solving characterized by user‐centeredness, ideation, and iterative prototyping. The rapid diffusion of Design Thinking in practice has not been coupled with similarly rapid and robust development of its theoretical underpinnings. Most contributions have been inward‐oriented toward a confined community of scholars; therefore, the scientific discourse on Design Thinking has unfolded in a vacuum—often independently from other innovation management theories. The consequence has been that Design Thinking is often confused (especially among those new to the field) with the entire practice of design. Subsequently, we still lack an understanding on whether, why, and when Design Thinking contributes to innovation. In this editorial, we discuss the journey to the Special Issue “Design Thinking and Innovation Management: Matches, Mismatches and Future Avenues” that intends to critically reflect and enrich the scientific debate around Design Thinking. First, we aim at clarifying the distinction between “design” and “Design Thinking.” The former is a practice, to be studied; the latter is a paradigm, that is, a set of specific principles, methods, and tools to practice design. Second, we offer a brief overview of the community that has been investigating Design Thinking, a synthesis of the ten papers included in the Special Issue (distributed across this and the next issue), and show how they contribute to close the theoretical and empirical gaps with innovation studies. Finally, we suggest that the paradigm of Design Thinking is significantly contingent: its diffusion and success have been favored by the emergence of specific contextual conditions (substantially by the ubiquitous diffusion of digital technologies in direct interaction with users). As the context is dramatically shifting again, we wonder whether Design Thinking will keep its relevance and ability to support organizations in addressing the new challenges ahead? We address this question with the support of a contingent framework to position several design paradigms and suggest that the context ahead, where problems have multiple stakeholders and are undefined, will require the emergence of new paradigms characterized by a systemic (rather than user‐centered) and reflective (rather than ideative) practice. We therefore propose a few research questions that will hopefully encourage and shape future scholarly efforts into the study of the design practice for innovation in organizations.

Design Thinking: from Bibliometric Analysis to Content Analysis, Current Research Trends, and Future Research Directions

Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review Over a Past Decade

Design thinking for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis and case study research

Bibliometric Review of Design for Digital Inclusion

Design thinking: Critical analysis and future evolution

Food Design Thinking: A Systematic Review from an Evolutionary Perspective

A review of design intelligence: progress, problems, and challenges

Using Text Mining Techniques to Identify Research Trends: A Case Study of Design Research

Design Thinking and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review Exploring Synergies

Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research

Research trends in instructional design and technology journals

Exploring Trends in Intangible Cultural Heritage Design: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis

Creative Thinking in the Architecture Design Studio: Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Review

Design Thinking as an Effort to Enhance Critical Thinking and Science Literacy in Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Review

Quantitative dynamics of design thinking and creativity perspectives in company context

Contribution of the 'Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion' Concept to Design Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Inclusive Design Thinking for the Development of Digital Health Applications: A Methodology Review

The progress and trend of digital twin research over the last 20 years: A bibliometrics-based visualization analysis

Data-driven Innovation: Understanding the Direction for Future Research

A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains