The Future of Aviation Safety Regulation: New US-EU Agreement Harmonizes and Consolidates the Transatlantic Regime, but What is the Potential for Genuine Regulatory Reform?

Michael Jennison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/aila2013022

2013-09-01

Air and Space Law

Abstract:The recent US-EU bilateral aviation safety agreement represents a new height in the harmonization of aviation safety regulations. It also advances reciprocal reliance on the two side's safety oversight findings. The agreement may even take those worthy goals as far as they can reasonably go. At the same time, an industry group has identified overlapping and inconsistent regulatory barriers to the cross-border transfer of aircraft costing millions of dollars annually and asked the US, the EU, and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for help in reducing unnecessary regulatory barriers. The unfolding implementation of the complex US-EU safety agreement provides an occasion for considering whether true aviation safety reform is possible. As it happens, the FAA is undertaking a sweeping revision of one segment of its airworthiness regulatory code that will strip away the accretion of layered requirements developed over the years and substitute a much leaner, performance-based set of standards. Meaningful regulatory reform is possible, without compromising the gold standard of global safety, but it will require several steps. First, States must continue to work toward continuing compliance with existing global safety standards. Industry can continue to identify regulatory fat that can be eliminated. States can examine their own codes to find regulatory structures ripe for conversion to performance-based rulemaking. Finally, the US-EU partnership can continue to lead the way by moving regulatory reform principles into ICAO's global standard-setting process.