Cryopreservation of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells using a DMSO-free solution is comparable to DMSO-containing cryoprotectants: results of an international multicenter PACT/BEST collaborative study
Theodros Mamo,Cheryl A Cox,Connor Demorest,Magali J Fontaine,Allison Hubel,Linda Kelley,Aisha Khan,Denese C Marks,Shibani Pati,Jo-Anna Reems,Gabriele Spohn,Richard Schäfer,Rongye Shi,Lipei Shao,David Stroncek,David H McKenna,Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.07.001
IF: 6.196
2024-07-06
Cytotherapy
Abstract:Background and aim: An essential aspect of ensuring availability and stability of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) products for clinical use is that these cells are cryopreserved before individual infusion into patients. Currently, cryopreservation of MSCs involves use of a cryoprotectant solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). However, it is recognized that DMSO may be toxic for both the patient and the MSC product. In this Production Assistance for Cellular Therapies (PACT) and Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative study, we compared a novel DMSO-free solution with DMSO containing cryoprotectant solutions for freezing MSCs. Methods: A DMSO-free cryoprotectant solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine (SGI) in a base of Plasmalyte A was prepared at the University of Minnesota. Cryoprotectant solutions containing 5-10% DMSO (in-house) were prepared at seven participating centers (five from USA, one each from Australia and Germany). The MSCs were isolated from bone marrow or adipose tissue and cultured ex vivo per local protocols at each center. The cells in suspension were frozen by aliquoting into vials/bags. For six out of the seven centers, the vials/bags were placed in a controlled rate freezer (one center placed them at -80°C freezer overnight) before transferring to liquid nitrogen. The cells were kept frozen for at least one week before thawing and testing. Pre- and post-thaw assessment included cell viability and recovery, immunophenotype as well as transcriptional and gene expression profiles. Linear regression, mixed effects models and two-sided t-tests were applied for statistical analysis. Results: MSCs had an average viability of 94.3% (95% CI: 87.2-100%) before cryopreservation, decreasing by 4.5% (95% CI: 0.03-9.0%; P: 0.049) and 11.4% (95% CI: 6.9-15.8%; P< 0.001), for MSCs cryopreserved in the in-house and SGI solutions, respectively. The average recovery of viable MSCs cryopreserved in the SGI was 92.9% (95% CI: 85.7-100.0%), and it was lower by 5.6% (95% CI: 1.3-9.8%, P < 0.013) for the in-house solution. Additionally, MSCs cryopreserved in the two solutions had expected level of expressions for CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 with no significant difference in global gene expression profiles. Conclusion: MSCs cryopreserved in a DMSO-free solution containing sucrose, glycerol, and isoleucine in a base of Plasmalyte A had slightly lower cell viability, better recovery, and comparable immunophenotype and global gene expression profiles compared to MSCs cryopreserved in DMSO containing solutions. The average viability of MSCs in the novel solution was above 80% and, thus, likely clinically acceptable. Future studies are suggested to test the post-thaw functions of MSCs cryopreserved in the novel DMSO-free solution.