Abstract:It remains a pressing concern to understand how neural computations relate to risky decisions. However, most observations of brain-behavior relationships in the risk-taking domain lack a rigorous computational basis or fail to emulate of the dynamic, sequential nature of real-life risky decision making. Recent advances emphasize the role of neural prediction error (PE) signals. We modelled, according to prospect theory, the choices of n = 43 human participants (33 females, ten males) performing an EEG version of the hot Columbia Card Task, featuring rounds of sequential decisions between stopping (safe option) and continuing with increasing odds of a high loss (risky option). Single-trial regression EEG analyses yielded a subjective value signal at centroparietal (300-700 ms) and frontocentral (>800ms) electrodes and in the delta band, as well as PE signals tied to the feedback-related negativity, P3a, and P3b, and in the theta band. Higher risk preference (total number of risky choices) was linked to attenuated subjective value signals but increased PE signals. Higher P3-like activity associated with the most positive PE in each round predicted stopping in the present round but not risk taking in the subsequent round. Our findings indicate that decreased representation of decision values and increased sensitivity to winning despite low odds (positive PE) facilitate risky choices at the subject level . Strong neural responses when gains are least expected (the most positive PE on each round) adaptively contribute to safer choices at the trial-by-trial level but do not affect risky choice at the round-by-round level . Significance statement It remains an open question, most pressingly in mental health, how neural computations facilitate real-life risky behavior (e.g. drinking, criminal activities). This endeavor requires a rigorous computational basis as well as paradigms emulating the dynamic, sequential nature of real-life risk taking. We applied prospect theory to model sequentially dependent risky choices and isolated neural correlates of subjective decision values and unexpected gains (prediction errors). This allowed us to show that overall risk-taking was related to hyperactive prediction error and reduced decision value signals. Moreover, subjects responded more cautiously following higher neural responses to the least expected gains. These findings indicate multi-layered, independent roles of prediction error processing, mediating safer choices at the trial-level but risk tendencies at the subject-level.

Outlier Blindness: A Neurobiological Foundation for Neglect of Financial Risk

Cognitive Antecedents of Family Business Bias in Investment Decisions: A Commentary on “risky Decisions and the Family Firm Bias: an Experimental Study Based on Prospect Theory”

The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking

Impact of ambient sound on risk perception in humans: neuroeconomic investigations

Gazing through the bubble: an experimental investigation into financial risk-taking using eye-tracking

Financial Loss Aversion Illusion*

The case of 'Less is more': Modelling risk-preference with Expected Downside Risk

A Neuroeconomics Analysis of Investment Process with Money Flow Information: the Error-Related Negativity

Distinct neural dynamics of the observed ostracism effect in decision-making under risk and ambiguity

Reinforcement Learning and Savings Behavior

Macroeconomic Perceptions, Financial Constraints, and Anomalies

Uncertainty-modulated attentional capture: Outcome variance increases attentional priority.

Adaptive Integration of Perceptual and Reward Information in an Uncertain World

Risk-taking is associated with decreased subjective value signals and increased prediction error signals in the hot Columbia Card Task

Rapid Changes in Risk Preferences Originate from Bayesian Inference on Parietal Magnitude Representations

Effect of uncertainty visualizations on myopic loss aversion and equity premium puzzle in retirement investment decisions

Limited or Biased: Modeling Sub-Rational Human Investors in Financial Markets

Limited resources or limited luck? Why people perceive an illusory negative correlation between the outcomes of choice options despite unequivocal evidence for independence

Attention and Biases: Evidence from Tax-Inattentive Investors

Prospect Theory for Online Financial Trading

Investor experiences and financial market dynamics