On the role of viruses in nature and what this means for the COVID‐19 pandemic

Harald Brüssow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13720

2020-12-02

Microbial Biotechnology

Abstract:Viruses derive their name from the Latin word for poison. Words have great power, and their choice also influences the scientific discussion and the perception of viruses in the biological world. Viruses of bacteria got another name, bacteriophages, Greek for bacterial eaters, again underlining a negative role of viruses as predators. Viruses need for their replication a cellular substrate since even giant viruses sporting genome sizes that overlap that of bacteria cannot translate their proteins. In that sense, all viruses are obligate cellular parasites. However, considering viruses as enemies of life involved in an unending arms race with cells is probably too narrow, if not utterly wrong by overlooking important positive roles which viruses play in the living world. I will illustrate this with few points for bacterial viruses: first, bacteria divide by fission and have no sex. Genetically, they should be quite uniform, nearly clonal. However, bacterial species are displaying greater DNA sequence diversity than animal species due to horizontal gene transfer to which bacteriophages make a major contribution. One can thus consider bacteriophages as one of the motors of genetic diversification in bacteria. Second, some bacteria use temperate phages as weapons against competitors: lysogenic bacteria release phages that kill susceptible bacterial cells not containing prophage‐specific immunity systems. Some bacteria have further reduced prophages to P‐type bacteriocins that punch holes in competitor bacteria. Third, viruses conserve nutrients for small cells. Bacteria are grazed by protists, which are swallowed by small multicellular animals, which are eaten by ever larger animals in the food chain which finally become large enough to produce faecal droppings that sediment and transport nutrients into deeper ocean layers. If bacteria get infected by phage (or unicellular algae by viruses), the cell is lysed and liberates its content, which is too small to sediment. Cellular decay products remain thus in the 'microbial loop' and become nutrients for other microbes in the same niche. Phage infection can thus – somewhat counterintuitively – become a growth promoter for microbial growth. Fourth, microbial ecologists have attributed viruses a beneficial role for preserving biodiversity. Below a certain concentration threshold, bacteria cannot be infected with bacteriophages. If bacterial populations grow beyond this point and strive to dominance, phage infection sets in, reducing the population size until their number falls again below the threshold. This phenomenon was called the 'killing the winning population' concept which prevents overgrowth by one strain/species, thereby maintaining diversity in an ecosystem. Fifth, viruses open new food sources to cells that learned to coexist with them. Bacteria can recruit prophages to become pathogens, which exploit animal hosts as nutrient source. Indeed, a number of bacterial pathogens carry prophages that encode critical virulence genes or toxins. It was speculated that bacterial pathogenicity evolved when bacteria had to cope with grazing protists. Bacteria containing prophages, which encode toxins for eukaryotic cells, can kill protists. Instead of being eaten by protists, bacteria (and indirectly their associated prophages) now exploit protists. Since bacteria‐eating protists resemble macrophages of animals, this strategy might have been maintained during evolution of animals. In fact, friend and foe in biology are context‐dependent terms.

biotechnology & applied microbiology,microbiology