Abstract:For more than half a century, studies on skull base surgery have focused on clinical end points, such as completeness of tumor removal, response to radiation, complications, local control, and survival. Surgical procedures are inarguably fundamental for the treatment of skull base neoplasms, but they represent only part of overall patient care. As physicians, we are trained to provide our patients the optimal treatment for achieving the highest survival rate. Concern about their quality of life (QOL) is too often overshadowed by our zeal for a possible cure. The two commonly accepted essential goals of treatment should be both the improvement of survival and the quick restoration of patients' QOL. In 1950, Karnofsky and Burchenal published a landmark work in which they introduced a standardized measure of functional status, which has continued to impact the assessment of cancer patients to this day.1 Modern instruments for estimation of health-related QOL offer an alternative to subjective measurements of the patient's status. It is important for surgeons to be aware that they cannot estimate their patients' perspectives on QOL issues without asking them and that validated disease-specific instruments addressing multiple domains of QOL should be utilized for realistic assessment. Detailed understanding of the different aspects that make up an individual's QOL may help surgeons improve the evaluation and management of their patients, identify specific impediments as early as possible during follow-up, and apply appropriate medical interventions to patients with increased risk and poor outcome. Early access of patients to detailed information about their predicted QOL status can also lead to better adjustment to an imminent medical condition. This themed issue of Skull Base is devoted to the topic of QOL in patients with skull base neoplasms. Significant improvements in our awareness and knowledge of QOL measures have motivated experts in the field to expend considerable efforts in making valuable contributions to this special issue. The first series of articles presented here focuses on a review of our current knowledge on the physical, psychological, and social well-being of patients with skull base tumors. Instruments that are applied for the estimation of health-related QOL issues in patients with skull base neoplasms are also reviewed. The second section of this issue presents five original articles dealing with the impact of current treatment modalities on health-related QOL issues. A sixth article examines the QOL issues of patients undergoing endonasal skull base surgery. Despite our increasing knowledge about the QOL issues of patients with skull base tumors, the ability to recruit a sufficient sample size to arrive at evidence-based conclusions remains the biggest limitation. As a result, there is often inadequate statistical power to conduct meaningful analyses of potential medical or demographic risk factors that might influence the QOL outcomes of this patient population. As such, the limited number of skull base patients in any single program calls for broad collaborative effort. A special article by Snehal Patel introduces the use of a Web-based data collection method sponsored by the North America Skull Base Society that can function as a collaborative registry and an effective tool for the collection of QOL data. One future challenge in skull base surgery is the advancement of QOL research by conducting comparative multicenter studies that include assessments of QOL measures. Research such as this will inevitably advance our efforts not only to improve our patients' life expectancy but afford them a life worth living.

QOLP-15. QUALITATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENTIAL QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) IN SUPRASELLAR MENINGIOMA PATIENTS TREATED VIA ENDOSCOPIC ENDONASAL APPROACH VERSUS OPEN CRANIOTOMY

Surgical outcomes and longitudinal quality of life after endoscopic endonasal surgery for anterior skull base meningioma

Endoscope-Assisted Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for the Resection of Benign Tumors of the Sellar Region

Long-Term Quality of Life Among Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Pituitary Gland Surgery

The Impact of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery on Quality of Life in Patients with Malignant Tumors of the Anterior Skull Base: A Prospective Study.

Life after surgical resection of a meningioma: a prospective cross-sectional study evaluating health-related quality of life

Quality of life and surgical outcomes in incidental pituitary adenomas undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection

Gender Differences in Quality-of-Life Outcome in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

Quality of life in patients with skull base meningiomas treated with microsurgery: a prospective observational study

Health-Related Quality of Life in Adult Patients with Craniopharyngioma

Evaluation of sinonasal-related quality of life of 49 patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery

University of Washington Quality of Life subdomain outcomes after treatment of sinonasal malignancy: A prospective, multicenter study

Cognition, Emotional States and Health-Related Quality of Life in Awake Craniotomy for Glioma: A Case Series

Olfactory-specific quality of life outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery

Predictors of improvement in quality of life at 12-month follow-up in patients undergoing anterior endoscopic skull base surgery.

Assessment of quality of life in patients with craniopharyngioma and identification of risk factors for compromised overall wellness

Qol-05. Comparing Disease-Specific Quality-Of-Life Outcomes Of Microsurgery, Radiotherapy, And Observation In Vestibular Schwannoma Patients: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Comment on, "Longterm outcome and quality of life after CNS cavernoma resection: eloquent vs. noneloquent areas"

Timing of Resection of Spinal Meningiomas and Its Influence on Quality of Life and Treatment

Quality of Life in Patients with Skull Base Tumors

Quality of Life in Patients with Benign Lateral Skull Base Neoplasms Following Infratemporal Fossa Approaches