Abstract:We present here a review of the state of current knowledge of the use of DNA retrieved from environmental and community samples for population genetics. Then, focusing on environmental DNA (eDNA), we summarize the opportunities but also detail four main limitations of its use for population‐level inferences. Although the use of eDNA is appealing for scientists, conservation managers and other practitioners, it is imperative that its limitations are known and considered to avoid false expectations and incorrect inferences. Molecular techniques using DNA retrieved from community or environmental samples, in particular environmental DNA (eDNA), are becoming increasingly popular for detecting individual species, assessing biodiversity, and quantifying ecological indices. More recently, eDNA has also been proposed as a template for population genetics, and several studies have already tested the feasibility of this approach, mostly looking at vertebrate species. Their results along with general opportunities offered by these types of "community‐based" samples, such as the possibility to target multiple species at the same time, have generated great enthusiasm and expectations for using eDNA in population genetics. However, not every aspect of population genetics can be addressed by eDNA‐based data and some inherent limitations may challenge its conclusions. Here, we firstly review the state of current knowledge of DNA retrieved from environmental and community samples for population genetics. Then, focusing on eDNA, we summarize the opportunities but also detail four main limitations of its use for population‐level inferences, namely, (1) the difficulty to retrieve a species‐specific dataset, (2) the potential lack of correlation between observed and true allelic frequencies, (3) the loss of individual information in multi‐locus genotyping and linkage between loci, and (4) the uncertainty about the individuals contributing to the sampled DNA pool (e.g., number, life‐stage, or sex). Some of these limitations might be overcome with the development of new technologies or models that account for the specificities of eDNA. Others, however, are inherent, and their effect on the inferences must be thoroughly evaluated. The possibility of gaining insights into genetic diversity and population structure from DNA retrieved from community and environmental samples is appealing for scientists, conservation managers, and other practitioners. Yet, to avoid false expectations and incorrect inferences, it is imperative that these limitations are known and considered alongside the opportunities and advantages.

Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA

Trade‐offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on “Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?” by Pawlowski et al., (2020)

Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring

Environmental DNA: The next chapter

Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity

ENVIRONMENTAL DNA IN AN OCEAN OF CHANGE: STATUS, CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS

The need for robust qPCR‐based eDNA detection assays in environmental monitoring and species inventories

Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods

Opportunities and inherent limits of using environmental DNA for population genetics

Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects

The use of environmental DNA for biodiversity monitoring in lentic and lotic ecosystems

Emerging Challenges in Molecular Paleontology: Misapplication of Environmental DNA Fragments and Misconception of Deamination as a Key Criterion for In Situ DNA Identification

The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics

An epigenetic toolbox for conservation biologists

Recent advances in environmental DNA‐based biodiversity assessment and conservation

A Systematic Review of Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in eDNA Data for Environmental Monitoring

Targeting terrestrial vertebrates with eDNA: Trends, perspectives, and considerations for sampling

Reporting the limits of detection and quantification for environmental DNA assays

Extracellular DNA in environmental samples: Occurrence, extraction, quantification, and impact on microbial biodiversity assessment

Quantifying biodiversity using eDNA from water bodies: General principles and recommendations for sampling designs