The effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly on energy intake, appetite, control of eating, and gastric emptying in adults with obesity

Martin Friedrichsen,Astrid Breitschaft,Sayeh Tadayon,Alicja Wizert,Dorthe Skovgaard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.14280
2021-01-03
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Abstract:AimsThis trial investigated the effects of once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg on gastric emptying, appetite, and energy intake in subjects with obesity. Materials and methodsA double‐blind, parallel‐group trial was conducted in 72 adults with obesity, randomized to once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (dose‐escalated to 2.4 mg) or placebo for 20 weeks. Gastric emptying was assessed using paracetamol absorption following standardized breakfast. Subject‐reported appetite ratings and Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) responses were assessed, and energy intake was measured during ad libitum lunch. ResultsParacetamol AUC0–5h,para (primary endpoint) was increased by 8% (P = 0.005) with semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo at week 20 (non‐significant when corrected for week 20 body weight; P = 0.12). No effect was seen on AUC0–1h,para, Cmax,para, or tmax,para. Ad libitum energy intake was 35% lower with semaglutide versus placebo (1736 versus 2676 kJ; estimated treatment difference: –940 kJ; P <0.0001). Semaglutide reduced hunger and prospective food consumption, and increased fullness and satiety when compared with placebo (all P <0.02). The CoEQ indicated better control of eating and fewer/weaker food cravings with semaglutide versus placebo (P <0.05). Bodyweight was reduced by 9.9% with semaglutide and 0.4% with placebo. Safety was consistent with the known profile of semaglutide. ConclusionsIn subjects with obesity, once‐weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg suppressed appetite, improved control of eating, and reduced food cravings, ad libitum energy intake and bodyweight versus placebo. There was no evidence of delayed gastric emptying at week 20, assessed indirectly via paracetamol absorption. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?