Urban resilience: A vague or an evolutionary concept?

Melika Amirzadeh,Saeideh Sobhaninia,Ayyoob Sharifi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103853

IF: 11.7

2022-06-01

Sustainable Cities and Society

Abstract:Considering the rapid urbanization trends in many parts of the world and the increasing consequences of climate change, more and more cities are at risk of natural disasters and other environmental, socio-economic, and political disruptions. To address these issues, resilience thinking has attracted the attention of a wide range of stakeholders. However, despite considerable attention to this concept and its frequent usage, resilience remains ambiguous with diverse interpretations in policy discussions and academic debates about cities. Since such vague interpretations would lead to difficulties in theory and practice, the present study aims to clarify some of these concepts by providing a comprehensive review focused on resilience features and comparing different perspectives regarding urban resilience. The study results showed that the main reason behind such ambiguities is that resilience has undergone fundamental changes since its inception, and recent approaches to resilience are generally based on the non-equilibrium model of resilience. There are three main dimensions, including systems, agents, and institutions, as well as three main approaches to urban resilience, including recovery, adaptation, and transformation. This study's conceptual framework of urban resilience provides scholars and policymakers with a more transparent and comprehensive picture of urban resilience and helps them make better-informed decisions.

energy & fuels,construction & building technology,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is the ambiguity and diverse interpretations of the concept of urban resilience. With the acceleration of the global urbanization process and the impacts brought by climate change, more and more cities are facing natural disasters and other environmental, socio - economic and political disruptions. Although the concept of "resilience" has received wide attention and is frequently used, it still has a variety of different interpretations in policy discussions and academic debates, leading to difficulties in theory and practice.

### Specific objectives of the paper include:
1. **Clarify the concept of resilience**: By comprehensively reviewing the literature, explore the meaning, origin and its conceptual model of resilience to explain its diversity and ambiguity.
2. **Compare different perspectives**: Analyze and compare different views on urban resilience, especially its planning objectives, scope, dimensions, stages and methods.
3. **Provide a transparent framework**: Provide a clearer and more comprehensive conceptual framework of urban resilience for scholars and decision - makers to help them make more informed decisions.

### Main findings:
- **Meaning and origin of resilience**: The word "resilience" is derived from the Latin "resilire", which means "to bounce back". It was initially used to describe the ability of materials to resist external shocks, and was later extended by ecologists to ecosystems, and further applied to multiple fields such as social sciences, psychology, and economics.
- **Two main resilience models**:
- **Equilibrium Model**: Emphasizes the ability of a system to return to its original state after being disturbed, and is suitable for linear systems.
- **Non - equilibrium Model** (also known as evolutionary resilience): Emphasizes the adaptability and transformation ability of a system, and is suitable for complex adaptive systems.

- **Five aspects of urban resilience**:
- **Planning objectives**: Include restoring normalcy, reducing vulnerability, adapting to change, enhancing capabilities and sustainable development, etc.
- **Scope**: Involves multiple levels such as society, economy, and infrastructure.
- **Dimensions**: Include three main dimensions: system, agent and institution.
- **Stages**: Are divided into four stages: preparation, response, recovery and adaptation.
- **Methods**: Include three main methods: recovery, adaptation and transformation.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to provide a more explicit and unified conceptual framework for urban resilience research, thereby promoting the development of theory and practice.