Abstract:It is now well-established that different markets may develop different growth-supporting institutions that can give rise to public firms and set capital markets in motion. Yet, the paradigm view still holds local alternatives as merely stepping stones, a transitional passage toward achieving a deeper and more advanced market, at which point conventional legal and market institutions—modeled on Anglo-American corporate capitalism—are still held necessary.Four decades of economic development in China challenge these conventions. With modern firms with global prominence and a capital market that is the second largest in the world, corporate governance in China seems to have passed the point of an "adjust or perish" prognostic. The system that governs Chinese firms and the ways in which capital markets function sustain strong governance attributes that go against many fundamentals in economics and legal thought. Political involvement and state ownership, both assumed to stand in the way of capital market growth, remain prevalent while the market continues to advance.Most strikingly, harmonization with conventional corporate governance been pushed aside as the Chinese Communist Party has decided to exercise an ever-more expansive and direct role in market activity. Public firms in present-day China are increasingly being governed by a "politicized corporate governance." Political institutions with corporate governance capacities have been deployed both inside and outside firms. These institutions now buttress or even replace weaker traditional corporate governance mechanisms in the Chinese market.The implications are striking. First, despite justified reasons for alarm, a politicized corporate governance system in China can perform the main functions of corporate governance elsewhere, thereby offering some benefits for public firms and their stockholders. Second, these developments show how path-dependent corporate governance attributes, here political institutions, reject convergence predictions yet have enough plasticity to evolve and to support modern firms and markets beyond assumed thresholds and developmental milestones. In so doing, China's politicized corporate governance casts doubts on law and development conventions as well as on both sides of a long-standing governance convergence debate. Finally, the politicization of corporate governance in China offers a new direction in comparative corporate governance scholarship, providing evidence of an instituted reversal from outwardly convergent corporate governance toward a new form of a planned economy.

The Distorted Governance Model of Venture Capital Limited Partnerships in China: A Political Perspective

Do Venture Capitalists Play A Monitoring Role in an Emerging Market? Evidence from the Pay-Performance Relationship of Chinese Entrepreneurial Firms

Monitoring or Colluding: the Role of Venture Capital Investors in the IPO Process

On Legal System of Recognizing Identity of Limited Copartner

Research on Financial Affairs Governance of Venture Capital Corporation:Feature and Reality of Limited Partnership

Analysis on the China's venture capital fund arrangement

A Study of Incentive and Constraint Mechanism of Venture Capital Investment Institutions in China

Promoting the Development of Limited Partnership in Our Venture Capital Fields

Harnessing venture capital in China

China’s VC Industry: A Punctuated Structuration Model of Institutional Entrepreneurship

Legislative Consideration of whether the Limited Partnership be Introduced into China

Design and Application in China of Trading Mechanism for Venture Capital

On Adopting Venture Capital of Limited Partnership in China

Corporate System VS Limited Partnership:A Study on Tax Policy Discrimination

Legal System and Syndication Strategy: Cross-border Venture Capital Investments in China

Did Government Venture Capital Fund Innovative but Less Profitable Companies? Evidence from China

Revolving Around Political Connections: the Negative Effect of Government Venture Capital Backing on IPO Valuation

The Politicization of Corporate Governance: A Viable Alternative?

Investigating the Motivations of VC Syndication in China --- Do Chinese Leading VC Firms Make a Difference in Terms of Syndication Decisions

THE PARTNERSHIP QUESTION AS A SCALE QUESTION: Extending the Theorization of Entrepreneurial Urbanism in China

Exit of Chinese Domestic Venture Capital: Legal Impediments and Reform Measures