Reproductive skew, fighting costs and winner–loser effects in social dominance evolution

Olof Leimar,Redouan Bshary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13691

2022-03-29

Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract:Journal of Animal Ecology, Accepted Article.

ecology,zoology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Reproductive skew, fitness costs, and winner-loser effects in social-dominance evolution

Olof Leimar,Redouan Bshary

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.22.449392

2021-06-22

Abstract:Abstract Social hierarchies can increase reproductive skew in group-living animals. Using game theory we investigate how the opportunity for differently ranked individuals to acquire resources influences reproductive skew, costs of hierarchy formation, and winner and loser effects. Individuals adjust their aggressive and submissive behaviour through reinforcement learning. The learning is based on perceived rewards and penalties, which depend on relative fighting ability. From individualbased simulations we determine evolutionary equilibria of traits that control an individual’s learning. We examine situations that differ in the extent of monopolisation of contested resources by dominants and in the amounts of uncontested resources that are distributed independently of rank. With costly fighting, we find that stable dominance hierarchies form, such that reproductive skew mirrors the distribution of resources over ranks. Individuals pay substantial costs of interacting, in particular in high-skew situations, with the highest costs paid by intermediately ranked individuals. For cases where dominants monopolise contested resources there are notable winner and loser effects, with winner effects for high ranks and very pronounced loser effects for lower ranks. The effects are instead weak when acquired resources increase linearly with rank. We compare our results on contest costs and winner-loser effects with field and experimental observations.
Learning from fights: Males' social dominance status impact reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster

Antoine Prunier,Severine Trannoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299839

IF: 3.7

2024-03-09

PLoS ONE

Abstract:In animals, the access to vital resources often relies on individuals' behavioural personality, strength, motivation, past experiences and dominance status. Dominant individuals would be more territorial, providing them with a better access to food resources and mate. The so-called winner and loser effects induce individuals' behavioural changes after experiencing a victory or a defeat, and lead to an individual persistent state influencing the outcome of subsequent fights. However, whether and how development of winner and loser effects affect individuals' fitness is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate how individuals' fitness can be influenced by previous fighting experience in Drosophila melanogaster . In this study, we assess various behavioural performances as indicators for dominant and subordinate fitness. Our results show that subordinates are less territorial than dominants although their locomotor abilities are not affected. We also demonstrate that in a non-competitive context, experiencing a defeat reduces males' motivation to court females but not the reproductive success while in a competitive context, it negatively affects males' reproductive success. However, we found no impact upon either males' ability to distinguish potential mates nor on females' choice of a specific mating partner. Overall, these results indicate that previous defeats reduce reproductive success, a commonly used estimate of individual fitness.

multidisciplinary sciences
The Evolution of Social Dominance II: Multi-Player Models

G. Sander Van Doorn,Geerten Hengeveld,Franz Weissing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156853903771980611

2003-01-01

Behaviour

Abstract:Abstract The social hierarchies observed in natural systems often show a high degree of transitivity. Transitive hierarchies do not only require rank differentiation within pairs of individuals but also a higher level ordering of relations within the group. Several authors have suggested that the formation of linear hierarchies at the group level is an emergent property of individual behavioural rules, referred to as winner and loser effects. Winner and loser effects occur if winners of previous conflicts are more likely to escalate the current conflict, whereas the losers of previous conflicts are less likely to do so. According to this idea, an individual's position in a hierarchy may not necessarily reflect its fighting ability, but may rather result from arbitrary historical asymmetries, in particular the history of victories and defeats. However, if this is the case, it is difficult to explain from an evolutionary perspective why a low ranking individual should accept its subordinate status. Here we present a game theoretical model to investigate whether winner and loser effects giving rise to transitive hierarchies can evolve and under which conditions they are evolutionarily stable. The main version of the model focuses on an extreme case in which there are no intrinsic differences in fighting ability between individuals. The only asymmetries that may arise between individuals are generated by the outcome of previous conflicts. We show that, at evolutionary equilibrium, these asymmetries can be utilized for conventional conflict resolution. Several evolutionarily stable strategies are based on winner and loser effects and these strategies give rise to transitive hierarchies.

zoology,behavioral sciences
Reproductive Dominance Strategies in Insect Social Parasites

Patrick Lhomme,Heather M. Hines

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-018-0971-z

2018-05-22

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Abstract:In eusocial insects, the high cost of altruistic cooperation between colony members has favoured the evolution of cheaters that exploit social services of other species. In the most extreme forms of insect social parasitism, which has evolved multiple times across most social lineages, obligately parasitic species invade the nests of social species and manipulate the workforce of their hosts to rear their own reproductive offspring. As alien species that have lost their own sociality, these social parasites still face social challenges to infiltrate and control their hosts, thus providing independent replicates for understanding the mechanisms essential to social dominance. This review compares socially parasitic insect lineages to find general trends and build a hypothetical framework for the means by which social parasites achieve reproductive dominance. It highlights how host social organization and social parasite life history traits may impact the way they achieve reproductive supremacy, including the potential role of chemical cues. The review discusses the coevolutionary dynamics between host and parasite during this process. Altogether, this review emphasizes the value of social parasites for understanding social evolution and the need for future research in this area.

ecology,biochemistry & molecular biology
[The effect of DHEA on AKT signal pathway on transplanted Morris hepatomas in rats].

Yan-fang Jiang,P. Zhao,Jun-jie Qin,Ming-hui Li,Matsuzaki Yasushi,J. Niu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-3418.2009.09.010

2009-09-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE To investigate the inhibitory effect of dehydroepaimdrosterone (DHEA) on the growth of transplanted Morris hepatomas (7288CTC) in vivo in rats. METHODS 21 Buffalo rats were randomly devided into 4 groups, including one blank control group (n = 5), one group for tumor-bearing control (n = 6), and 2 experimental groups with DHEA (n = 6) or DHEA-s (n = 4). DHEA or DHEA-s was fed to the rats for 4 weeks immediately after Morris hepatomas (7288CTC) was implanted in both flanks. Phenotypes of the spleen lymphocytes were examined by flow cytometry, Akt and PTEN expression in tumor cells was detected by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Tumor weights of DHEA treated group were less than those of the control (P less than 0.05), the inhibitory rate was 43%. The results of Western blot and immunohistochemistry showed that in DHEA tumor group,the expression of phosphorilated Akt protein was decreased, the expression of PTEN was enhanced, the percentage of CD3 positive cells and the ratio of CD4/CD8 were increased (P less than 0.05). CONCLUSION DHEA can inhibit tumor growth, possibly via the inhibition of the Akt signaling pathway as well as modulating the immune function.
Reproductive variance can drive behavioral dynamics

Guocheng Wang,Qi Su,Long Wang,Joshua B Plotkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216218120

2023-03-21

Abstract:The concept of fitness is central to evolution, but it quantifies only the expected number of offspring an individual will produce. The actual number of offspring is also subject to demographic stochasticity-that is, randomness associated with birth and death processes. In nature, individuals who are more fecund tend to have greater variance in their offspring number. Here, we develop a model for the evolution of two types competing in a population of nonconstant size. The fitness of each type is determined by pairwise interactions in a prisoner's dilemma game, and the variance in offspring number depends upon its mean. Although defectors are preferred by natural selection in classical population models, since they always have greater fitness than cooperators, we show that sufficiently large offspring variance can reverse the direction of evolution and favor cooperation. Large offspring variance produces qualitatively new dynamics for other types of social interactions, as well, which cannot arise in populations with a fixed size or with a Poisson offspring distribution.
Reproductive skew in quasisocial parasitoids: how egalitarian is cooperative brooding?

Xiaomeng Guo,Qi Zhao,Ling Meng,Ian C.W. Hardy,Baoping Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.02.008

IF: 3.041

2022-04-01

Animal Behaviour

Abstract:Primitively social Sclerodermus parasitoids form female multifoundress groups on large, paralysed hosts and then cooperatively care for large broods of offspring throughout their development. We identified offspring using microsatellite markers and found that nearly every foundress produced offspring, implying that overall reproductive skew was not extreme. We expected that kinship may influence skew if, for instance, relatives within a group collectively suppress the reproduction of a nonrelative or if nonrelatives selfishly overexploit group reproductive optima. We found slight skew, in favour of the nonsibling, when two full-sibling foundresses brooded with one nonsibling foundress but no skew when three sibs brooded with one nonsibling. All foundresses made similar contributions to the sexual composition of broods, which were highly female biased. We expected body size differences might promote skew via physical domination of some foundresses by others or via intrinsically differential fecundity. We found heterogeneity in the relative contributions of dissimilar-sized foundresses but no skew overall. Nevertheless, males within these broods were more often the progeny of the largest foundress, suggesting that larger females are able to dominate the production, or the survival, of males. We expected that temporal priority may generate skew via early individuals having a longer period in which to reproduce and/or become dominant. We found that the skew indeed favoured foundresses that had started to reproduce before a second foundress was introduced. Further, if eggs laid by a first foundress had started to hatch before a second foundress was introduced, the second foundress produced female offspring only. Overall, we found that skew is not strongly associated with kinship among foundresses but does appear to be associated with intrinsic or acquired dominance and that where skew is manifest it can comprise brood sex ratio effects as well as overall reproduction effects.

zoology,behavioral sciences
Relationship between dominance hierarchy steepness and rank-relatedness of benefits in primates

Pengzhen Huang,Malgorzata E Arlet,Krishna N Balasubramaniam,Brianne A Beisner,Eliza Bliss-Moreau,Lauren J N Brent,Julie Duboscq,Iván García-Nisa,Stefano S K Kaburu,Rachel Kendal,Martina Konečná,Pascal R Marty,Brenda McCowan,Jérôme Micheletta,Julia Ostner,Oliver Schülke,Gabriele Schino,Bonaventura Majolo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arae066

2024-08-13

Abstract:In animal social groups, the extent to which individuals consistently win agonistic interactions and their ability to monopolize resources represent 2 core aspects of their competitive regime. However, whether these two aspects are closely correlated within groups has rarely been studied. Here, we tested the hypothesis that hierarchy steepness, which is generally used to represent power differentials between group members, predicts the variation in the distribution of fitness-related benefits (i.e. fecundity, infant survival, mating success, and feeding success) in relation to individual dominance ranks. We tested this hypothesis in primate groups using comparative phylogenetic meta-analytical techniques. Specifically, we reviewed published and unpublished studies to extract data on individual dominance ranks, their access to fitness-related benefits, and hierarchy steepness. We collected and included in our analysis a total of 153 data points, representing 27 species (including 2 chimpanzee sub-species). From these, we used 4 common methods to measure individual dominance ranks and hierarchy steepness, i.e. D ij -based normalized David's scores, randomized Elo-ratings, and David's scores and Elo-ratings estimated in Bayesian frameworks. We found that hierarchy steepness had no effect on the strength of the relationship between dominance rank and access to fitness-related benefits. Our results suggest that hierarchy steepness does not reflect between-group variation in the extent to which individual dominance affects the acquisition of fitness-related benefits in primates. Although the ability to win agonistic encounters is essential, we speculate that other behavioral strategies adopted by individuals may play crucial roles in resource acquisition in animal competitive regimes.
Advances in understanding neural mechanisms of social dominance

Tingting Zhou,Carmen Sandi,Hailan Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2018.01.006

IF: 7.07

2018-01-01

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract:Dominance hierarchy profoundly impacts social animals' survival, physical and mental health and reproductive success. As the measurements of dominance hierarchy in rodents become established, it is now possible to understand the neural mechanism mediating the intrinsic and extrinsic factors determining social hierarchy. This review summarizes the latest advances in assay development for measuring dominance hierarchy in laboratory mice. It also reviews our current understandings on how activity and plasticity of specific neural circuits shape the dominance trait and mediate the 'winner effect'.
A retrospective view of early research on dominance, stress and reproduction in cooperatively breeding carnivores

Scott Creel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105119

Abstract:Social carnivores have been central in studies of cooperative breeding, and research using noninvasive methods to examine behavioral and endocrine mechanisms of reproductive suppression started in the 1980s with dwarf mongooses in Serengeti National Park. Here, I synthesize the methods, findings and limitations of a research program that examined relationships between social dominance, age, mass, aggression, mating, gonadal steroids, glucocorticoids and reproduction in female and male dwarf mongooses, African wild dogs and wolves. Infanticide is a reliable backstop for reproductive suppression in females, and reproduction is energetically costly in these species. These conditions favor hypothalamic - pituitary - gonadal (HPG) adaptations that reduce the fertility of subordinate females to avoid the cost of producing doomed offspring. Infanticide also favors close synchronization of reproduction when subordinate females do become pregnant. In males, infanticide is a less reliable backstop and reproduction is less costly, so direct effects of subordination on fertility are less pronounced. Age is a strong predictor of social dominance in these species, but the evolutionary reason for this is not clear. In dwarf mongooses and wild dogs, alpha females were never deposed by younger packmates, but alpha males were: this difference is also not understood. Patterns of reproduction supported models predicting that alphas are less likely to share reproduction when the fitness costs of reproduction are high, when the fitness expected for dispersers is low, and with young subordinates to whom they are more closely related. Correlations between dominance and adrenal glucocorticoid concentrations varied between species and sexes, but did not support the hypothesis that chronic stress causes reproductive suppression.
How feedback and feed-forward mechanisms link determinants of social dominance

Tobit Dehnen,Josh J Arbon,Damien R Farine,Neeltje J Boogert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12838

Abstract:In many animal societies, individuals differ consistently in their ability to win agonistic interactions, resulting in dominance hierarchies. These differences arise due to a range of factors that can influence individuals' abilities to win agonistic interactions, spanning from genetically driven traits through to individuals' recent interaction history. Yet, despite a century of study since Schjelderup-Ebbe's seminal paper on social dominance, we still lack a general understanding of how these different factors work together to determine individuals' positions in hierarchies. Here, we first outline five widely studied factors that can influence interaction outcomes: intrinsic attributes, resource value asymmetry, winner-loser effects, dyadic interaction-outcome history and third-party support. A review of the evidence shows that a variety of factors are likely important to interaction outcomes, and thereby individuals' positions in dominance hierarchies, in diverse species. We propose that such factors are unlikely to determine dominance outcomes independently, but rather form part of feedback loops whereby the outcomes of previous agonistic interactions (e.g. access to food) impact factors that might be important in subsequent interactions (e.g. body condition). We provide a conceptual framework that illustrates the multitude potential routes through which such feedbacks can occur, and how the factors that determine the outcomes of dominance interactions are highly intertwined and thus rarely act independently of one another. Further, we generalise our framework to include multi-generational feed-forward mechanisms: how interaction outcomes in one generation can influence the factors determining interaction outcomes in the next generation via a range of parental effects. This general framework describes how interaction outcomes and the factors determining them are linked within generations via feedback loops, and between generations via feed-forward mechanisms. We then highlight methodological approaches that will facilitate the study of feedback loops and dominance dynamics. Lastly, we discuss how our framework could shape future research, including: how feedbacks generate variation in the factors discussed, and how this might be studied experimentally; how the relative importance of different feedback mechanisms varies across timescales; the role of social structure in modulating the effect of feedbacks on hierarchy structure and stability; and the routes of parental influence on the dominance status of offspring. Ultimately, by considering dominance interactions as part of a dynamic feedback system that also feeds forward into subsequent generations, we will understand better the factors that structure dominance hierarchies in animal groups.
Evolutionary Patterns of Intersexual Power

Rebecca J. Lewis,E. Christopher Kirk,Ashley D. Gosselin-Ildari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233695

2023-11-30

Animals

Abstract:Dominance and leverage are both possible causes of social inequality. If sexual dimorphism influences patterns of intersexual dominance, we predicted that highly dimorphic species are constrained to exhibit male-biased power (MP), but species with low sexual dimorphism are free to demonstrate a broader range of intersexual power relationships. If market effects influence intersexual leverage, we predicted that females have more power when group composition is more male-biased and estrus is asynchronous. We analyzed data on intersexual power, sexual dimorphism, expected estrous overlap, and sex ratio for 79 extant primate species using phylogenetic logistic regression and ancestral state reconstructions. Although MP is more common, every major primate clade includes non-MP species. MP was associated with greater body mass and canine length dimorphism and with female-biased sex-ratios. Low estrous overlap was associated with non-MP. Although MP was reconstructed as likely ancestral for anthropoids, the last common ancestor of this clade probably did not exhibit high sexual dimorphism. The last common ancestor of catarrhines was probably highly dimorphic, potentially constraining intersexual power relationships. Non-MP probably evolved multiple times in primates and may be less common because multiple traits are linked to MP while fewer traits are associated with female-biased power or equality.

agriculture, dairy & animal science,veterinary sciences
Reproductive restraint to avoid the costs of reproductive conflict in a cooperatively breeding mammal

Graham Birch,Hazel J. Nichols,Francis Mwanguhya,Michael A. Cant,Jonathan D. Blount

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.12.584411

2024-03-14

Abstract:The costs of reproductive conflict can be an important factor shaping the evolution of life histories in animal societies. These costs may change as individuals age and grow, and with within-group competition. Social costs of reproductive conflict have been invoked to explain why females might gain from delaying maturity or ceasing reproduction midway through life, but not in males. Here we analyze more than 20 years of data to understand how individual male banded mongooses adjust their reproductive activity in response to the costs of reproductive conflict. In banded mongooses groups multiple female breeders enter oestrus synchronously and males compete to mate guard the females. The oldest and heaviest males in the group gained the greatest share of paternity, while younger and lighter males obtained little or no paternity. Those lighter males that are reproductively active paid disproportionate survival costs. Our results suggest that by delaying or suppressing reproduction early in life, males may reduce their mortality. Males may also avoid inflicting costs on their male kin by queuing. These results from an egalitarian cooperative breeding mammal may provide a rare example of voluntary reproductive restraint, although we cannot discount reproductive suppression by rival males.

Animal Behavior and Cognition
[Clinical picture of lung disease due to Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (author's transl)].

M. Tsukamura,H. Shimoide,N. Kita,H. Kondo,J. Segawa

1976-02-01

Abstract:
Socio-ecological context modulates significance of territorial contest competition in Drosophila prolongata

Alessio N De Nardo,Broti Biswas,Jhoniel Perdigón Ferreira,Abhishek Meena,Stefan Lüpold

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.26.587716

2024-05-15

Abstract:The intensity and direction of sexual selection is intricately linked to the social and ecological context. Both operational sex ratios (OSRs) and population densities can affect the ability of males to monopolize resources and mates, and thus the form and intensity of sexual selection on them. Here, we studied how the mating system of the promiscuous and strongly sexually dimorphic fruit fly Drosophila prolongata responds to changes in the OSR and population density. We recorded groups of flies over five days and quantified territory occupancy, mating success, and competitive fertilization success. Although sexual selection was stronger under male-biased than even OSRs but unrelated to density, realized selection on morphological traits was higher under even OSRs and increased with density. Larger and more territorial males achieved both higher mating success and competitive fertilization success, but only under even OSRs. Our combined results also support a shift in the mating system from territorial contest competition to scramble competition under male-biased OSRs and potentially at low density, where there was no clear contribution of the measured traits to reproductive success. Our study emphasizes the limitations of traditional selection metrics and the role of the socio-ecological context in predicting adaptation to a changing environment.

Evolutionary Biology
Parthenogenesis, sexual conflict, and selection on fertilization rates in switching environments

Xiaoyuan Liu,Jon W. Pitchford,George W. A. Constable

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.09.544312

2024-08-14

Abstract:In the face of varying environments, organisms exhibit a variety of reproductive modes, from asexuality to obligate sexuality. Should reproduction be sexual, the morphology of the sex cells (gametes) produced by these organisms has important evolutionary implications; these cells can be the same size (isogamy), one larger and one smaller (anisogamy), and finally the larger cell can lose its capacity for motility (oogamy, the familiar sperm-egg system). Understanding the origin of the sexes, which lies in the types of gametes they produce, thus amounts to explaining these evolutionary transitions. Here we extend classic results in this area by exploring these transitions in a model in which organisms can reproduce both sexually and asexually (a reproductive mode present in many algae). In particular, we investigate the co-evolution of gamete cell size with fertilization rate, which is a proxy for motility and pheromone production but usually held constant in such models. Using adaptive dynamics generalized to the case of switching environments, we find that isogamy can evolve to anisogamy through evolutionary branching, and that anisogamy can evolve to oogamy or suppressed pheromone production through a further branching driven by sexual conflict. We also derive analytic conditions on the model parameters required to arrest evolution on this isogamy-oogamy trajectory, with low fertilization rates and stochastically switching environments stabilizing isogamy under a bet-hedging strategy, and low fertilization costs stabilizing anisogamy and pheromone production.

Evolutionary Biology
The multinomial index: a robust measure of reproductive skew

Cody T Ross,Adrian V Jaeggi,Monique Borgerhoff Mulder,Jennifer E Smith,Eric Alden Smith,Sergey Gavrilets,Paul L Hooper

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2025

2020-10-14

Abstract:Inequality or skew in reproductive success (RS) is common across many animal species and is of long-standing interest to the study of social evolution. However, the measurement of inequality in RS in natural populations has been challenging because existing quantitative measures are highly sensitive to variation in group/sample size, mean RS, and age-structure. This makes comparisons across multiple groups and/or species vulnerable to statistical artefacts and hinders empirical and theoretical progress. Here, we present a new measure of reproductive skew, the multinomial index, M, that is unaffected by many of the structural biases affecting existing indices. M is analytically related to Nonacs' binomial index, B, and comparably accounts for heterogeneity in age across individuals; in addition, M allows for the possibility of diminishing or even highly nonlinear RS returns to age. Unlike B, however, M is not biased by differences in sample/group size. To demonstrate the value of our index for cross-population comparisons, we conduct a reanalysis of male reproductive skew in 31 primate species. We show that a previously reported negative effect of group size on mating skew was an artefact of structural biases in existing skew measures, which inevitably decline with group size; this bias disappears when using M. Applying phylogenetically controlled, mixed-effects models to the same dataset, we identify key similarities and differences in the inferred within- and between-species predictors of reproductive skew across metrics. Finally, we provide an R package, SkewCalc, to estimate M from empirical data.
Dominance, Sharing, and Assessment in an Iterated Hawk--Dove Game

Cameron L. Hall,Mason A. Porter,Marian S. Dawkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.02160

2019-10-31

Abstract:Animals use a wide variety of strategies to reduce or avoid aggression in conflicts over resources. These strategies range from sharing resources without outward signs of conflict to the development of dominance hierarchies, in which initial fighting is followed by the submission of subordinates. Although models have been developed to analyze specific strategies for resolving conflicts over resources, little work has focused on trying to understand why particular strategies are more likely to arise in certain situations. In this paper, we use a model based on an iterated Hawk--Dove game to analyze how resource holding potentials (RHPs) and other factors affect whether sharing, dominance relationships, or other behaviours are evolutionarily stable. We find through extensive numerical simulations that sharing is stable only when the cost of fighting is low and the animals in a contest have similar RHPs, whereas dominance relationships are stable in most other situations. We also explore what happens when animals are unable to assess each other's RHPs without fighting, and we compare a range of strategies for this problem using simulations. We find (1) that the most successful strategies involve a limited period of assessment followed by a stable relationship in which fights are avoided and (2) that the duration of assessment depends both on the costliness of fighting and on the difference between the animals' RHPs. Along with our direct work on modeling and simulations, we develop extensive software to facilitate further testing; it is available at \url{<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://bitbucket.org/CameronLHall/dominancesharingassessmentmatlab/" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>}.

Populations and Evolution,Dynamical Systems,Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems,Physics and Society
Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles

David Berger,Ivain Martinossi-Allibert,Karl Grieshop,Martin I Lind,Alexei A Maklakov,Göran Arnqvist,Martin I. Lind,Alexei A. Maklakov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/687963

2016-10-01

The American Naturalist

Abstract:The evolution of male traits that inflict direct harm on females during mating interactions can result in a so-called tragedy of the commons, where selfish male strategies depress population viability. This tragedy of the commons can be magnified by intralocus sexual conflict (IaSC) whenever alleles that reduce fecundity when expressed in females spread in the population because of their benefits in males. We evaluated this prediction by detailed phenotyping of 73 isofemale lines of the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. We quantified genetic variation in life history and morphology, as well as associated covariance in male and female adult reproductive success. In parallel, we created replicated artificial populations of each line and measured their productivity. Genetic constraints limited independent trait expression in the sexes, and we identified several instances of sexually antagonistic covariance between traits and fitness, signifying IaSC. Population productivity was strongly positively correlated to female adult reproductive success but uncorrelated with male reproductive success. Moreover, male (female) phenotypic optima for several traits under sexually antagonistic selection were exhibited by the genotypes with the lowest (highest) population productivity. Our study forms a direct link between individual-level sex-specific selection and population demography and places life-history traits at the epicenter of these dynamics.
Individualistic attitudes in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma undermine evolutionary fitness and may drive cooperative human players to extinction

Erdem Pulcu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230867

IF: 3.5

2024-03-22

Royal Society Open Science

Abstract:Inarguably, humans perform the richest plethora of prosocial behaviours in the animal kingdom, and these are important for understanding how humans navigate their social environment. The success and failure of strategies human players devise also have implications for determining long-term socio-economic/evolutionary fitness. Following the footsteps of Press and Dyson (2012), I implemented their evolutionary game-theoretic modelling from Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (a behavioural economic probe of interpersonal cooperation) and re-analysed already published data on human proposer behaviour in the Ultimatum Game (a behavioural economic probe of altruistic punishment) involving 50 human participants versus stochastic computerized opponents with prosocial and individualistic social value orientations. Although the results indicate that it is more likely to break cycles of mutual defection in ecosystems in which humans interact with individualistic opponents, analysis of social-economic fitness at the Markov stationary states suggested that this comes at an evolutionary cost. Overall, human players acted in a significantly more cooperative manner than their opponents, but they failed to overcome extortion from individualistic agents, risking ‘extinction’ in 70% of the cases. These findings demonstrate human players might be short-sighted, and social interactive decision strategies they devise while adjusting to different types of opponents may not be optimal in the long run.

multidisciplinary sciences

Reproductive skew, fighting costs and winner–loser effects in social dominance evolution

Reproductive skew, fitness costs, and winner-loser effects in social-dominance evolution

Learning from fights: Males' social dominance status impact reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster

The Evolution of Social Dominance II: Multi-Player Models

Reproductive Dominance Strategies in Insect Social Parasites

[The effect of DHEA on AKT signal pathway on transplanted Morris hepatomas in rats].

Reproductive variance can drive behavioral dynamics

Reproductive skew in quasisocial parasitoids: how egalitarian is cooperative brooding?

Relationship between dominance hierarchy steepness and rank-relatedness of benefits in primates

Advances in understanding neural mechanisms of social dominance

A retrospective view of early research on dominance, stress and reproduction in cooperatively breeding carnivores

How feedback and feed-forward mechanisms link determinants of social dominance

Evolutionary Patterns of Intersexual Power

Reproductive restraint to avoid the costs of reproductive conflict in a cooperatively breeding mammal

[Clinical picture of lung disease due to Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex (author's transl)].

Socio-ecological context modulates significance of territorial contest competition in Drosophila prolongata

Parthenogenesis, sexual conflict, and selection on fertilization rates in switching environments

The multinomial index: a robust measure of reproductive skew

Dominance, Sharing, and Assessment in an Iterated Hawk--Dove Game

Intralocus Sexual Conflict and the Tragedy of the Commons in Seed Beetles

Individualistic attitudes in Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma undermine evolutionary fitness and may drive cooperative human players to extinction