Abstract:This paper underlines the importance of the distinction between `social' and `system' integration (agency and structure) introduced by David Lockwood in 1964. Its four sections (i) examine the original difficulty of maintaining any distinction between the `parts' of society and its `people' against the social ontology of Individualism whose proponents argued that the former must always be reduced to the latter as individuals were the ultimate constituents of society, (ii) shows how collectivist opposition held `systemic factors' to be indispensable in sociological explanations, but could not substantiate their ontological status against the charge of reification whilst empiricism held sway, (iii) explores how once the individualist/collectivist debate was superseded, Lockwood's distinction was redefined in structuration theory, where insistence on treating structure and agency as mutually constitutive effectively denied their independent variation and thus reduced the `social' and the `systemic' to differences in the scale of social practices; (iv) argues that social realism's ontology, in which `structures' and `agents' belong to different emergent strata of social reality, avoids reducing one to the other or eliding the two. Instead it supplies the ontological grounding for Lockwood's distinction and enables it to be developed into an explanatory programme - analytical dualism - whose central tenet is the need to explore the interplay between these two irreducible constituents of social reality in order to account for why things are `so and not otherwise' and in a manner which is of direct utility to practical analysts of society.

Cambridge social ontology, the philosophical critique of modern economics and social positioning theory: an interview with Tony Lawson, part 1

Cambridge social ontology, the philosophical critique of modern economics and social positioning theory: an interview with Tony Lawson, part 2

The strategic-relational approach, realism and the state: from regulation theory to neoliberalism via Marx and Poulantzas, an interview with Bob Jessop

Reasoning in Social Settings

Good in a crisis: the ontological institutionalism of social constructivism

Social Integration and System Integration: Developing the Distinction

Marxism and the Concept of a Social Formation: An Immanent Critique of the Views of Jairus Banaji

Urban land use, mobility and theory of science: exploring the potential for critical realism in empirical research

Pluralism in economics and the question of ontological pluralism

Integrating Discourse, Construction and Objectivity: A Contemporary Realist Approach

Asymmetrical, symmetrical and artifactual man: group size and cooperation in James Buchanan’s constitutional economics

Broadening the Horizons of Sts: an Interview with Donald MacKenzie

AI and Social Theory

One Dimensional versus Interactive View on Economic Analysis of Law:An Academic Dialogue with Judge Posner

Dialectical critical realism, complexity and the psychology of blame

How to do realistic political theory (and why you might want to)

British politics symposium on Ben Clift (2022) the OBR and the politics of technocratic economic governance (Oxford University Press)

Insider apology for microeconomic theorising?

What is social science if not critical?

Economics with(out) ethics? An interdisciplinary encounter between public economists and John Rawls in the 1970s

The neuro-cognitive turn in cultural sociology: from 1.0 to 2.0