Regaining Paradise Lost: Indigenous Land Rights and Tourism
Mary Kristerie A. Baleva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004376786
2019-01-01
Abstract:Colonization irrevocably altered the course of nations. It shaped Euro-centric international law, which, during its inception, was largely both an enabler and justification for the subjugation of indigenous peoples, and the confiscation of their territories and resources. This chapter traces the developments and regressions in indigenous rights discourse, from the Age of Discovery, to attempts at remediation of historic injustice through predominantly integrationist policies, and until the more recent adoption of the International Labour Organization’s Indigenous and Tribal Peoples’ Convention in 1989, and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. It expounds on individual and collective rights, the broad coverage and import of self-determination, and indigenous peoples’ free, prior, and informed consent as, if not a right unto itself, an important component of these rights. Business entanglements in human rights violations – slavery, child labor, inhumane work conditions, unfair wages, and exploitative arrangements with oppressive regimes – have been rife since antiquity. This chapter presents contemporary cautionary tales of legal and reputational risks when the fulfilment of the corporate responsibility to respect human rights is weighed, measured, and found wanting. It also traces the international community’s current reliance on “soft law”, particularly on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, to prevent and address corporate complicity in human rights abuses, in light of the failure of binding instruments to come into fruition. Additionally, this chapter presents a summary of international and regional grievance mechanisms that afford recourse to victims. This chapter revisits pre-colonial and colonial Philippines, as it expatiates on the emergence of the two most important precepts in indigenous land rights discourse: the Regalian doctrine on the one hand, and the Cariño doctrine on the other. It demonstrates the progressions and regressions of State policies on the “natives” during the Spanish and American colonial regimes, and until prior to the 1987 Constitution. This chapter presents cases decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines to demonstrate the development of judicial appreciation of the State’s international human rights obligations under the auspices of the 1987 Constitution. Compared with the earlier iterations of the Philippines’ organic law, the 1987 Constitution contains more substantive provisions on human rights in general, and in particular, respect for the rights of “indigenous cultural communities” to their culture and ancestral lands. These provisions, as well as the Cariño doctrine, served as the foundation of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997, which updates reference to indigenous cultural communities to include indigenous peoples (ICCs/IPs), in keeping with the developments in international indigenous rights discourse. This chapter expounds on the bundle of indigenous rights recognized under the ipra, and the right to free, prior, and informed consent, as a means of preventing development aggression in ancestral domains and lands. Tourism, one of the most lucrative industries around the globe, is in a constant quest to discover and develop more enticing and exotic locations, many of which are located in indigenous territories. This chapter focused on tourism and indigenous peoples, specifically the industry’s impacts on indigenous land rights. Moreover, it analyzes the role of the United Nations World Tourism Organization (unwto) in the promotion of human rights, and the remediation of grievances through the Global Code of Ethics for Tourism (gcet). It also briefly presents the unwto Framework Convention on Tourism Ethics, and its Optional Protocol. Finally, this chapter elucidates on the Philippine Tourism Act of 2009, with the ungp s as the overarching analytical legal framework. Chapter Six is a case study on the legal, social, and political dynamics that characterized the Ati Indigenous Community’s application for State recognition of their native title to their ancestral domains in Boracay Island, the prime tourist destination in the Philippines. It contextualizes the rights guaranteed by the ipra as experienced by the Ati of Boracay, their 15-year struggle to exert these rights, and the challenges they continue to face despite the issuance of a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title in their favor.