Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the extent to which traditional juristic approaches to determining intention in Islamic law are altered in the institutional framework and standard-setting project of the Malaysian state. Design/methodology/approach The study used the transnational law theory, which views normativity as culturally, socially and religiously embedded. The development of norms, customs and laws is also contingent on self-maximizing behavior. The Sharīʿa Advisory Council's interpretation of the bayʿ al-ʿīnah standard is a case study of this approach to the development of law. Findings This study shows that traditional approaches to determining the validity of an Islamic contract have been displaced by the institutional logic of the state, which prioritizes uniformity and certainty in law and reflects liberal, Western and capitalistic values. Islamic standard setting is part of the state's objective to uniformize law due to the globalization of financial markets. The normative collisions in the standard-setting project produce a new jurisprudence based on the state's uniform and purposive determination of a contract's validity. Research limitations/implications Further research on institutional frameworks is needed to conceptualize how Islamic commercial principles and ethics can be incentivized in the state's legal systems. Originality/value Few works, if any, have examined the interaction of the state's institutional environment with jurists' traditional approaches to determining contractual intention. Most scholarship assumes the decisive role of market forces, but the role of law and institutions in this context is under-researched.

The Interpretation of Contracts under Japanese Law

Control of Price Related Terms in Standard Form Contracts in Japan

Comparison of Employment System Between China and Japan——In View of Implicit Contracts Theory

A Discussion about the Limitations Decided by the Nature of Tour Contracts——A View from the Theory and Judicial Practice in Japan

Language and the Law Revisited: An Intellectual History of Contractual Interpretation

An analysis of interpretation of insurance contracts: common law versus strict contra proferentem

Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction

The Function of Judicial Practice Concerning the Reform of the Japanese Civil Code (Example of “Contract for Work”)

The Interwoven Relationship between Contract Interpretation and Legal Interpretation

A SNAPSHOT OF CHINESE CONTRACT LAW FROM AN HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

The Cultural (Re)Turn in Japanese Law Studies

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

An Analysis on the Disputed Issues of the Applicable Law for Foreign-Related Contracts

Language Rights in Japanese Criminal Courts: Bridging the Gap Between Legal Professionals and Language Professionals

Comments on Art.2 of The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Issues Concerning the Application of Law for Sales Contracts

Brief Discussion of the Translation of International Business Contracts

On the Foundation of Interpretations of a Civil Law and the Application of Methods in the Interpretations

Partial Non-use of Interpreters in Japanese Criminal Court Proceedings

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

War Reparation Lawsuits and Judgments in Japan and the Chinese Reactions:Some Reflections on the Principle of Non-Intervention

The new legalities of Islamic contractual interpretation: institutional frameworks and the displacement of intention