The evolution of historical scholarship and the rise of the visible and accountable national security state: tales from a life in Intelligence Studies

R. Gerald Hughes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2021.2004667
2022-02-23
Abstract:This article examines the evolution of the discipline of Intelligence Studies by evaluating how academics have woven scholarship with activism targeting prevailing cultures of state secrecy. Christopher Andrew has been in the vanguard of these efforts, and it is argued here that he pursued these goals for three reasons. First, the old cultures of secrecy hampered historical scholarship. Second, these cultures represented an obstruction to public understanding of the mission of intelligence agencies. Third, obsessive secrecy inhibited the ability of the intelligence agencies to benefit from a very real engagement with the past. Andrew has been instrumental in melding the causes of democratic accountability with that of academic freedom, successfully arguing for reforming cultures of secrecy.
political science,international relations,history
What problem does this paper attempt to address?