Abstract:Abstract The green technology spillover (GTS) is conducive to follower’s innovation opportunities but harmful to pioneer’s innovation advantages. Based on the knowledge production function and the panel data of cities in China, this paper discusses the effects of GTS on the relationship between the low carbon regulation (LCR) and the green technology innovation (GTI) by using the Spatial Durbin Model. We found that LCR makes a decrease-increase effect of the pioneer’s GTI different from an increase-decrease effect of the follower’s GTI .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of exploring the relationship between Low Carbon Regulation (LCR) and Green Technology Innovation (GTI), as well as the role of Green Technology Spillover (GTS) in this relationship. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:
1. **The impact of low carbon regulation on green technology innovation**:
- Investigate the impact of increasing low carbon regulation intensity on the level of green technology innovation. The paper finds that the impact of low carbon regulation on green technology innovation has a characteristic of first decreasing and then increasing. In the short term, due to the increase in compliance costs, corporate profits decline, and R&D personnel loss, leading to a decrease in the level of green technology innovation. However, in the long term, as more companies are affected by low carbon regulation, high-carbon companies not only become sensitive to regulation but also possess good R&D capabilities and learning abilities, enabling them to timely adjust the development path of green technology innovation, thereby promoting the improvement of green technology innovation levels.
2. **The moderating role of green technology spillover effect on the relationship between low carbon regulation and green technology innovation**:
- Explore the moderating role of green technology spillover effect on the relationship between low carbon regulation and green technology innovation. The paper finds that the green technology spillover effect makes it difficult for leading companies to gain an innovation advantage because knowledge spillover may lead to the inability to fully recover the cost of their R&D investment, thereby weakening their green innovation advantage. For follower companies, although they can gain a short-term innovation advantage by utilizing knowledge spillover, in the long run, due to the lack of support for secondary green technology innovation, their level of green technology innovation will gradually decline.
3. **Different responses of leading and follower companies**:
- Analyze the different responses of leading and follower companies under low carbon regulation. Leading companies reduce green technology innovation in the short term due to increased compliance costs, but in the long term, as the intensity of regulation increases, their level of green technology innovation will gradually recover and improve. Follower companies can achieve a higher level of green technology innovation in the short term by utilizing knowledge spillover, but in the long run, due to the lack of continuous innovation capability, their level of green technology innovation will gradually decline.
Through these studies, the paper aims to provide policymakers with suggestions on how to balance the relationship between low carbon regulation and green technology innovation to promote sustainable development.