Abstract:The great tragedy of the last decade is that so much of the economic and political turmoil on both sides of the Atlantic has been unnecessary. Needless and excessive fiscal austerity, asymmetric inflation targeting, and the failure to address persistent sovereign and household debt overhangs have turned serious but manageable financial crises into long-term threats to the liberal international order. The real economic consequences have been massive: a “lost decade” for the Eurozone, a Great Depression in Greece, and below-trend income growth in the US and UK since 2008. Macroeconomic policies that might have resolved the crises quickly and accelerated the economic recovery – in particular, large-scale fiscal stimulus, with an emphasis on infrastructure investment generating substantial employment and taking advantage of historically-low (negative) real interest rates – were never even attempted. The political consequences of these fiscal and monetary “own goals” have been equally massive: a marked rightward political shift in many industrialized countries and a surge in populist nationalism, as illustrated most clearly in the cases of Brexit and the election of Donald Trump. This essay explores the reasons why policymakers failed so spectacularly, as well as the ramifications of this failure for the future of the global economy. It emphasizes two key factors: the persistence and pervasiveness of “bad” economic ideas, and the long-term, negative consequences of central bank independence. In a sort of Gresham’s Law of political economy, macroeconomic policy debates have been dominated by false narratives and discredited ideas, such as the household analogy, the morality of debt, and expansionary austerity. The prevalence of these narratives precluded any serious discussion of meaningful stimulus or debt relief on both sides of the Atlantic. This was especially tragic, given that we knew from history exactly what not to do in the wake of financial crises – and yet, we did it anyway. At the same time, central bank independence – while a successful institutional innovation to the inflationary problems of the 1970s and 1980s – proved to be a roadblock to effective monetary responses to the current crises. In particular, the widespread adoption of 2% inflation “ceilings,” along with the dominance of central bank governing boards by hawkish former bankers and economists, prevented serious discussion of more aggressive monetary policies that might have accelerated the recovery. This failure of macroeconomic policy and the ensuing era of stagnation has triggered a rising backlash against globalization. At the same time, we may now be seeing a counter-backlash, as those most dependent on cross-border supply chains and globalized financial markets increasingly speak out against Brexit, repealing NAFTA and other trade agreements, and increasing immigration restrictions. Despite fears of a rollback of globalization and the collapse of the liberal international order, the most likely medium-term outcome now seems to be increasing isolation of the US and UK, with the rest of the world’s major economies moving forward with continued trade and financial integration. The greater risk is that we will still not have fully recovered from the past decade's crises when the next major crisis hits – and that we will once again fail to learn from our past macroeconomic policy errors when it does.

Credible interventionism: economic ideas of government and macroeconomic policy in the Great Recession

Let'S Mpc the Economy: Stabilising the Economy Using More Dynamic Regulation

"Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity" in the Era of Polycrisis: Institutionalist Economics beyond the t/T Duality

This Time Should Have Been Different: The Causes and Consequences of Macroeconomic Policy Failure in the Great Recession

Preliminary steps toward a universal economic dynamics for monetary and fiscal policy

The credibility of monetary policy and the fiscal response to the pandemic in the Eurozone

How Macroeconomists Lost Control of Stabilization Policy: Towards Dark Ages

Great Recession and Macroeconomic Theory: A Useless Crisis?

Policy Stability and Economic Growth: Lessons from the Great Recession

The economic way of thinking in a pandemic

Brazilian countercyclical economic policies as a response to the Great Recession: a critical analysis and an alternative proposal to ensure macroeconomic stability

James Tobin on macroeconomic instability: an old Keynesian changes ground

Managing the crisis? Think-tanks and the British response to Global Financial Crisis and Great Recession

Expectations, Coordination Failures and Macro Crises

Evolutions and Contradictions in Mainstream Macroeconomics: The Case of Olivier Blanchard

What Happened: Financial Factors in the Great Recession

Mediating the German Ideology: Ordoliberal Framing in European Press Coverage of the Eurozone Crisis

Special section introduction: epistemic politics in international and comparative political economy

The Determinants of Fiscal and Monetary Policies During the COVID-19 Crisis

Beware of Financial Repression: Lessons from History

The Impact of the Great Recession on Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Developed Market Economies