Abstract:Background: Many experimentally-derived data sets are generated in the practice of clinical chemistry. Graphical presentation is essential to assess the data distribution. The distribution must also be assessed quantitatively. These approaches will determine if the data is Normal or not. Finally the results of these tests of Normality must be shown to be free of sample size effects. Methods: Four experimentally-derived data sets were used. They represented normal, positive kurtotic, positive- and negatively-skewed distributions. These data sets were examined by graphical techniques, by moment tests, by tests of Normality, and monitored for sample size effects. Results: The preferred graphical techniques are the histogram and the box-and-whisker plots that may be supplemented, with advantage, by quantile-quantile or probability-probability plots. Classical tests of skewness and kurtosis can produce conflicting and often confusing results and, as a consequence, the alternative use of the newer L-moments is advocated. Normality tests included the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (Lilliefors modification), Cramér-von Mises and Anderson-Darling tests (empirical distribution function statistics) and the Gan-Koehler, Shapiro-Wilk, Shapiro-Francia, and Filliben tests (regression/correlation techniques). Of these only the Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, and Shapiro-Francia tests correctly classified all four test samples. The effect of sample size on the resulting p-value was investigated using Royston's V'/v' graphical test. Conclusions: A systematic approach to Normality testing should follow the route of graphical presentation, the use of L-moments, the use of Anderson-Darling, Shapiro-Wilk, or Shapiro-Francia testing, and Royston's sample size monitoring.

Comparison of selected tests for univariate normality based on measures of moments

A power comparison of various normality tests

Power analysis of several normality tests: A Monte Carlo simulation study

Comparative evaluation of goodness of fit tests for normal distribution using simulation and empirical data

Efficiency Comparison of the Statistical Tests for Multivariate Normal Distribution

Detection of Non-Normality in Data Sets and Comparison between Different Normality Tests

Monte Carlo comparison of normality tests based on varentropy estimators

Testing for normality in any dimension based on a partial differential equation involving the moment generating function

Tests of fit for the power function lognormal distribution

A test for normality and independence based on characteristic function

Comparison of Normality Tests in Terms of Sample Sizes under Different Skewness and Kurtosis Coefficients

Testing experimental data for univariate normality

Omnibus tests of multinormality based on skewness and kurtosis

Skewness and kurtosis as criteria of normality in observed frequency distributions

Testing multivariate normality by testing independence

Size and power properties of some tests in the Birnbaum-Saunders regression model

Comparing Ratios of the Mean to a Power of Variance in Two Samples Via Self-Normalized Test Statistics

Comparison of different goodness-of-fit tests

Testing Multivariate Normality Based on Beta-Representative Points

Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints

Tests for Skewness, Kurtosis, and Normality for Time Series Data