Abstract:Background Functional exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) is used to quantify changes in cardiac reserve and can improve early cardiac dysfunction diagnosis and follow-up.[1.2] Current ESE protocols do not account for individual variations in fitness and heart rate response, leading to difficulties in defining normal reference values.[2,3] Physiologically defined exercise intensity domains could be implemented as part of combined cardiopulmonary and ESE testing (CPET-ESE) to address this problem. Purpose We propose that using exercise intensity domains as part of CPET-ESE will result in cardiac reserve values not influenced by individual cardiorespiratory fitness or physical activity (PA) levels. We also hypothesise by matching work-rates and heart rates (HR), respectively, cardiac reserve will be higher in those exercising at the higher exercise intensity domain. Methods A total of 45 healthy adults (mean age 43.8 ± 14.2, range 18-65 y) underwent a CPET followed by a CPET-ESE consisting of two 6-minute stages: 1. Moderate intensity (MOD) at 90% of the work-rate at the gas exchange threshold (GET) and 2. High intensity (HIGH) at 40% of the difference between GET and peak. Global left ventricular and right ventricular free wall (LV and RV) longitudinal strain (Sl), RV fractional area change (RV-FAC), peak LV and RV TDI derived systolic (S') and diastolic velocities (E') were measured at each step, including rest. HIGH steps were matched 1-to-n with MOD steps from other participants based on work-rate and HR, respectively. Questionnaire derived PA was classified as low, moderate, and high active. Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured as peak oxygen uptake relative to body mass (mL·kg-1·min-1). Results After adjusting for age and sex, neither higher PA nor peak VO2 were associated with higher cardiac function parameters at either intensity (Table 1). Higher peak VO2 was associated with higher work-rate for HIGH only, while higher PA was associated with lower HR for MOD only (interaction term p<0.05). When paired by matching HR and work-rate, respectively, HIGH was associated with higher cardiac function parameters compared to MOD (all except for LV-S' and RV-FAC when HR matched, Table 2), despite those matched from HIGH being older, less physically active and having lower peak VO2 (p<0.05 for all). Conclusions Current ESE protocols, which define submaximal exercise intensity using arbitrary work-rate or HR targets,[3] do not account for the complex differences in exercise response between healthy individuals. Cardiac function augmentation during exercise is likely a response to VO2 kinetics and this is not accurately described by either HR or work-rate alone. We derived normal reference values for cardiac reserve from implementing physiologically defined exercise intensity domains within the combined CPET-ESE testing frameworks. These values could be more appropriately used when comparing diverse clinical populations using CPET-ESE.

Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index

The influence of sex, hemoglobin mass, and skeletal muscle characteristics on cycling critical power

Comparison Between Treadmill and Bicycle Ergometer Exercises in Terms of Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Sex differences in the associations between right heart structure and peak exercise capacity parameters in amateur cyclists

How to interpret a cardiorespiratory fitness assessment – Key measures that provide the best picture of health, disease status and prognosis

Relationship Between the Ruffier Test and Maximal Treadmill Testing in Healthy Adults

Validity of the Maximal Heart Rate Prediction Models among Runners and Cyclists

Improving exercise cardiac reserve assessment using a novel cardiopulmonary and echocardiography testing protocol (CPET-ESE) based on individualised exercise intensity domains

Reference Standards for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Measured With Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Using Cycle Ergometry: Data From the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND) Registry

A detailed analysis of body composition in relation to cardiopulmonary exercise test indices

Physiological and Psychological Responses to Three Distinct Exercise Training Regimens Performed in an Outdoor Setting: Acute and Delayed Response

Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test

2-WEEKS OF LOWER BODY RESISTANCE TRAINING ENHANCES CYCLING TOLERABILITY TO IMPROVE PRECISION OF MAXIMAL CARDIOPULMONARY EXERCISE TESTING IN SEDENTARY MIDDLE-AGED FEMALES.

Identification and comparison of heart-rate dynamics during cycle ergometer and treadmill exercise

Comparison of Physical Fitness and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Performance Using Arm Versus Leg Cycling in Patients With Cardiovascular or Pulmonary Disease–A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Assessment for cardiovascular fitness in patients with stroke: which cardiopulmonary exercise testing method is better?

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Parameters in Athletic Population: A Review

Aerobic capacity and respiratory indices of junior cross-country skiers and biathletes during incremental exercise testing

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing with Elastic Resistance: A New Reproducible Proposal for Determination of Ventilatory Thresholds and Maximum Oxygen Consumption

Lack of sex-specific differences in the associations between the dimensions of great vessels and exercise performance in amateur cyclists

Heart Rate, Oxygen Uptake and Anaerobic Thresholds During a Maximal Treadmill Test with World Class Mixed Martial Arts Fighters