Abstract:Objective To evaluate the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification. Methods From November 2008 to January 2012, 298 breast lesions in 298 patients underwent baseline ultrasonography and CEUS and the pathological diagnosis was obtained. The imaging data were analyzed independently by 3 radiologists, all of whom were blinded to identi, cation, clinical histories, histopathologic results and other imaging results of the patients and were not involved in sonographic imaging. Consensus results were obtained if opinions were different. The baseline ultrasound features were analyzed at first. Then the dynamic enhancement features were analyzed. Lesions were classified according to BI-RADS. The distinctions between benign and malignant lesions were analyzed. One hundred samples were randomly selected. According to the estimate odds ratios in multiple logistic regression analysis, important indicators of CEUS were selected. Then BI-RADS classification of the whole 298 cases corrected by important CEUS indicators were obtained. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic capability of BI-RADS classification before and after CEUS. Results Enhancement level, perfusion modes, alteration of enhanced region, distribution of the contrast medium, edge of enhancement and tumor vessels showed statistical difference between benign and malignant lesions. After logistic regression was performed, edge of enhancement (OR=12.173), alteration of enhanced region (OR=6.182), tumor vessels (OR=4.124 ) were selected as significant factors. BI-RADS classification of baseline ultrasound were as follows, 3 cases in category 2, 132 cases in category 3, 154 cases in category 4 and 9 cases in category 5. BI-RADS classification of baseline ultrasound combined CEUS were as follows, 3 cases in category 2, 157 cases in category 3, 109 cases in category 4 and 29 cases in category 5. After CEUS, more cases are classified as Category 3 and Category 5. Before and after CEUS, areas under the ROC curve were 0.826 and 0.885 (95% confidence interval were 0.772-0.880 and 0.839-0.932). Conclusions Enhancement level, perfusion modes, alteration of enhanced region, distribution of the contrast medium, edge of enhancement and tumor vessels showed statistical difference between benign and malignant lesions. Edge of enhancement, alteration of enhanced region and tumor vessels were significant factors. Bringing CEUS into BI-RADS could reduce the number of cases of BI-RADS category 4 and reduce unnecessary biopsies. Key words: Ultrasonography, mammary; Contrast media; Breast diseases

Improvements of the US BI-RADS Assessment – A Necessity for a Non-Invasive Positive and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Application of the New Full Breast Ultrasonography Concept

Value of Scoring by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Ultrasonic Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Combination of acoustic radiation force impulse technology and three-dimensional ultrasound in differential diagnosis of breast lessions

Significance and Feasibility of the Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System

Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Small Breast Lesions

Evaluating diagnostic significance: The utilization of elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis in breast lesions

Combined Use of the Ultrasound Elastography and the Automated Breast Volume Scanner in Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions

The Value of Conventional Ultrasound Combined with Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

Could Ultrasonic Elastography Help the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer with the Usage of Sonographic BI-RADS Classification?

Diagnostic algorithm: How to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging

Combined Use of Shear Wave Elastography, Microvascular Doppler Ultrasound Technique, and BI-RADS for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses

The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RA DS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging

Can Ultrasound Elastography Help Better Manage Mammographic BI-RADS Category 4 Breast Lesions?

The Differential Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in BI-RADSUS 4B Breast Lesions

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Improved Performance of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Evaluation of Critical Breast Lesions

A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Additive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Biopsy Decision of Ultrasound BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions

Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Elastography Assisted BI-RADS in the Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4a Lesions in China.

The Application Value of Using Semiquantitative and Quantitative Parameters in Multimodal Ultrasound to Distinguish Between Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Lesions

Ultrasound of the Breast, Including Interventions: An Update

Ultrasound strain elastography to improve diagnostic performance of breast lesions by reclassifying BI-RADS 3 and 4a lesions: a multicenter diagnostic study