The hegemonic ambiguity of big concepts in organization studies

Mats Alvesson,Martin Blom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720986847
IF: 5.658
2021-01-19
Human Relations
Abstract:The use of concepts is a vital part of the research process. Many researchers overexploit popular concepts by adding more and more vague and poorly defined meanings to them, thereby making their boundaries unclear and the concepts increasingly unwieldy. We will refer to these types of concepts as hembigs – an acronym for hegemonic, ambiguous, big concepts. The article demonstrates the problem in three domains: leadership, strategy and institution. It suggests ways to mitigate the problems with dominant scientific concepts, overloaded with more or less incoherent meanings.
management,social sciences, interdisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?