Abstract:The purpose of the research is to carry out a comparative analysis of the concepts of semiotics of cinema by Roland Barthes and Yurii Lotman in the context of their understanding of the nature of film language, since understanding and methods of studying of contemporary digital audiovisual art are the topic of current interest in contemporary art history. The research methodology. The contemporary study of digital audiovisual art, as a rule, takes place within the context of interdisciplinary work, therefore, one of the methodological principles of such work is structural and semiotic approach. Today, this methodological approach to study the audiovisual art is the most developed in the semiotics of cinema, therefore the visual semiotics is viewed through the semiotics of cinema. The scientific novelty of the research. For the first time a comparative analysis of Yurii Lotman’s and Roland Barthes’s semiotics of cinema within the framework of the structural and semiotic approach was carried out. The potential of this methodological approach in the study of audiovisual art has been revealed. Conclusions. The article highlights the special aspects of understanding and application of semiotic concepts by the mentioned authors based on the cinematographic material. Thus, Roland Barthes thought that problems in a semiotic study of the cinema occur when a linguistic approach is applied, and Yurii Lotman believed such study to be completely acceptable. This resulted in a different understanding by these scientists of the nature of film language, its minimal meaningful unit, the role of syntagmatics and paradigmatics in the film narration. Different perceptions of the nature of film language and its components are an important basis for the study of contemporary digital audiovisual arts. The main difficulty of semiotics of cinema is the issue of non discrete iconic (analogue) sign in the study of cinema within the framework of the structural and semiotic approach. This problem can be solved based on the legacy of semiotics of cinema of R. Barthes and Yu. Lotman. Another important characteristic of the structural and semiotic approach is its ability to be combined with other methodological approaches in the interdisciplinary study of digital audiovisual art

Dziga Vertov — Boris Kaufman — Jean Vigo

Dziga Vertov’s Cinema as a Language of Temporal Reflection

Dziga Vertov and Walt Whitman: Poetic Image in Documentary Films

Dziga Vertov and Sergei Eisenstein: on the history of rivalry

Vertov and the Avant-Garde Documentary: Dreaming Reality in the 1960s, from the USSR to Japan

O primado da disposição: Dziga Vertov e a exaltação do homem soviético

Dziga Vertov en Godard: teoría y praxis del cine-ojo y el cine-mano

Dziga Vertov and Leni Riefenstahl: Representation of Reality in a Totalitarian Era

The Ear against the Eye: Vertov’s Symphony

POETRY BY DZIGA VERTOV AND ANATOLY MARIENHOF: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Restoration of Lost Film Heritage on the Example of Dziga Vertov’s Film Anniversary of the Revolution

Spatial dialectics: montage and spatially organised narrative in stories without human leads

A Film Aesthetic to Discover

Organ and Machinery Projections in Florensky’s Philosophy and Vertov’s Cinematography

The other side of frontality: dorsality in European art cinema

The Context of Vertical Filmmaking Literature

The Story of a Comission: How Esfir Shub and Dziga Vertov Worked on a Film for the Tenth Anniversary of the Revolution

An Analysis of the Creative Style of French New Wave Cinema, Illustrated by Godard’s Film “Breathless”

History and modification of modern cinematic vocabulary

ROLAND BARTHES AND YURII LOTMAN: SEARCH FOR MEANING IN FILM NARRATIVE

Traditions of classical literature in the film “Brother” by Alexei Balabanov