Abstract:Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique with potential for counteracting disrupted brain network activity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) to improve cognition. However, the results of tDCS studies in AD have been variable due to different methodological choices such as electrode placement. To address this, a virtual brain network model of AD was used to explore tDCS optimization. We compared a large, representative set of virtual tDCS intervention setups, to identify the theoretically optimized tDCS electrode positions for restoring functional network features disrupted in AD. We simulated 20 tDCS setups using a computational dynamic network model of 78 neural masses coupled according to human structural topology. AD network damage was simulated using an activity-dependent degeneration algorithm. Current flow modeling was used to estimate tDCS-targeted cortical regions for different electrode positions, and excitability of the pyramidal neurons of the corresponding neural masses was modulated to simulate tDCS. Outcome measures were relative power spectral density (alpha bands, 8–10 Hz and 10–13 Hz), total spectral power, posterior alpha peak frequency, and connectivity measures phase lag index (PLI) and amplitude envelope correlation (AEC). Virtual tDCS performance varied, with optimized strategies improving all outcome measures, while others caused further deterioration. The best performing setup involved right parietal anodal stimulation, with a contralateral supraorbital cathode. A clear correlation between the network role of stimulated regions and tDCS success was not observed. This modeling-informed approach can guide and perhaps accelerate tDCS therapy development and enhance our understanding of tDCS effects. Follow-up studies will compare the general predictions to personalized virtual models and validate them with tDCS-magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a clinical AD patient cohort. Patient-friendly and non-invasive forms of brain stimulation are being investigated as alternative or additional treatments to medication in Alzheimer's disease, but there is still no general agreement on how to best perform them. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one of these techniques, in which a low electrical current is passed between electrodes placed on the scalp in order to regulate brain activity. In this study, we used a computer model of the Alzheimer's disease brain to simulate the effects that tDCS would have on brain activity, with the aim of predicting where the electrodes should be placed to see the most beneficial changes in brain activity. We compared 20 different electrode placements, and discovered placing the positive electrode at the back of the head resulted in the best improvement. For example, we saw a general increase in the speed of brain activity and increase in connectivity between brain regions, both of which are reduced in Alzheimer's disease. We believe that our approach can help guide non-invasive brain stimulation treatments in Alzheimer's disease and potentially other disorders, while helping keep the burden on patients to a minimum.

Dynamic changes of region-specific cortical features and scalp-to-cortex distance: implications for transcranial current stimulation modeling

Efficacy of scalp stimulation for multidomain cognitive impairment in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia: A network meta-analysis and meta-regression of moderators

Multifocal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Older Adults Depending on the Induced Current Density

Cognitive Improvement is Correlated with Increased Dynamic Functional Connectivity of Default Mode Network by Personalized Rtms in Alzheimer's Disease

Repeated High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulated Temporal Variability of Brain Regions in Core Neurocognitive Networks Over the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients

Recurrent and Concurrent Patterns of Regional BOLD Dynamics and Functional Connectivity Dynamics in Cognitive Decline

Investigating the effect of brain atrophy on transcranial direct current stimulation: A computational study using ADNI dataset

Altered cortical and subcortical morphometric features and asymmetries in the subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment

Differences In Scalp-To-Cortex Tissues Across Age Groups, Sexes And Brain Regions: Implications For Neuroimaging And Brain Stimulation Techniques

Mapping the electric field of high-definition transcranial electrical stimulation across the lifespan

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Alzheimer'S Disease: Challenges and Responses

Considerable effects of lateralization and aging in intracortical excitation and inhibition

Virtual neural network-guided optimization of non-invasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease

Aftereffect of single transcranial direct and alternating current stimulation on spontaneous home-cage and open-field EEG activities in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Transcranial direct current stimulation and neuronal functional connectivity in MCI: role of individual factors associated to AD

Cortical excitability and plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation studies

Functional Connectome Controllability in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment after Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Effect of Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Cognitive Function in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Two-Week Intervention

Differences in electric field strength between clinical and non-clinical populations induced by prefrontal tDCS: A cross-diagnostic, individual MRI-based modeling study

Pinpointing the Precise Stimulation Targets for Brain Rehabilitation in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease

A meta-analytical review of transcranial direct current stimulation parameters on upper limb motor learning in healthy older adults and people with Parkinson's disease