Unenhanced Breast MRI With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: Effects of Training on Performance and Agreement of Subspecialty Radiologists
Yeon Soo Kim,Su Hyun Lee,Soo-Yeon Kim,Eun Sil Kim,Ah Reum Park,Jung Min Chang,Vivian Youngjean Park,Jung Hyun Yoon,Bong Joo Kang,Bo La Yun,Tae Hee Kim,Eun Sook Ko,A Jung Chu,Jin You Kim,Inyoung Youn,Eun Young Chae,Woo Jung Choi,Hee Jeong Kim,Soo Hee Kang,Su Min Ha,Woo Kyung Moon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0528
IF: 7.109
2024-01-01
Korean Journal of Radiology
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether reader training improves the performance and agreement of radiologists in interpreting unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study of 96 breasts (35 cancers, 24 benign, and 37 negative) in 48 asymptomatic women was performed between June 2019 and October 2020. High-resolution DWI with b-values of 0, 800, and 1200 sec/mm² was performed using a 3.0-T system. Sixteen breast radiologists independently reviewed the DWI, apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and T1-weighted MRI scans and recorded the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category for each breast. After a 2-h training session and a 5-month washout period, they re-evaluated the BI-RADS categories. A BI-RADS category of 4 (lesions with at least two suspicious criteria) or 5 (more than two suspicious criteria) was considered positive. The per-breast diagnostic performance of each reader was compared between the first and second reviews. Inter-reader agreement was evaluated using a multi-rater κ analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).RESULTS: Before training, the mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the 16 readers were 70.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.4-79.9), 90.8% (95% CI: 85.6-94.2), and 83.5% (95% CI: 78.6-87.4), respectively. After training, significant improvements in specificity (95.2%; 95% CI: 90.8-97.5; <i>P</i> = 0.001) and accuracy (85.9%; 95% CI: 80.9-89.8; <i>P</i> = 0.01) were observed, but no difference in sensitivity (69.8%; 95% CI: 58.1-79.4; <i>P</i> = 0.58) was observed. Regarding inter-reader agreement, the κ values were 0.57 (95% CI: 0.52-0.63) before training and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.62-0.74) after training, with a difference of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.02-0.18; <i>P</i> = 0.01). The ICC was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.74) before training and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.80) after training (<i>P</i> = 0.002).CONCLUSION: Brief reader training improved the performance and agreement of interpretations by breast radiologists using unenhanced MRI with DWI.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging