Abstract:Abstract Due to the relative independence from the operational parameters, the linear retention indices (LRIs) are useful tool in gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) qualitative analysis. The aim of the current study was to develop a multiple linear regression (MLR) model for the prediction of LRIs as a function of selected molecular descriptors. Liquid injection GC-MS was used for the analysis of Essential oils (Rose, Lavender and Peppermint) separating the ingredients by a semi-standard non-polar stationary phase. As a result, a sum of 103 compounds were identified and their experimental LRIs were derived relying on reference measurements of a standard mixture of n-alkanes (from C8 to C20). As a next step, a set of molecular descriptors was generated for the distinguished chemical structures. Further, a stepwise MLR was applied for the selection of the significant descriptors (variables) which can be used to predict the LRIs. From an exploit set of over 2000 molecular descriptors, it was found that only 16 can be regarded as significant and independent variables. At this point split validation was applied: the identified compounds were randomly divided into training (85%) and validation (15%) sets. The training set (87 compounds) was used to derive two MLR models by applying i) the ‘enter’ algorithm ( R 2 = 0.9960, RMSЕ = 17) and ii) the ‘stepwise’ one ( R 2 = 0.9958, RMSЕ = 17). The predictive power was assessed by the validation set (16 compounds) as follows i) q 2 F1 = 0.9896, RMSE = 25 and ii) q 2 F1 = 0.9886, RMSE = 26, respectively. The adequateness of both regression approaches was further evaluated. Newly developed headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) procedures in combination with GC-MS were used for an alternative analysis of the studied Essential oils. Twelve additional compounds, not previously detected by the liquid sample introduction mode of analysis, were identified for which the values of the significant descriptors were within the working range of the developed MLRs. For the last compounds, the LRIs were calculated and the experimental data was used as an external set for assessment of the regression models. The predictive power for both regression approaches was assessed as follows: Enter RMSE = 41, q 2 F2 = 0.9503 and Stepwise RMSE = 40, q 2 F2 = 0.9521.

Characterization of Rose Essential Oils by Double-Region Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry (DRAPCI-MS) with Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA), and Heatmap Analysis

Chemometric Identification of Volatile Components in Essential Oils Extracted from Sweet Orange Peels by Different Methods

Comparative Study of Extraction Methods of Rose Flower Essential Oil

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of floral fragrance-related compounds in scented rose (Rosa hybrida) varieties and a subsequent evaluation on the basis of the analytical hierarchy process

Analysis of Volatile Components in Rosa roxburghii Tratt. and Rosa sterilis Using Headspace–Solid-Phase Microextraction–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Characterization of volatiles in flowers from four Rosa chinensis cultivars by HS-SPME-GC × GC-QTOFMS

Chemical investigation of volatiles emitted from flowers of three varieties of Damask rose cultivated in Beijing

The famous Turkish rose essential oil: Characterization and authenticity monitoring by FTIR, Raman and GC–MS techniques combined with chemometrics

Fast Quantification of Phenylethyl Alcohol in Rose Water and Chemical Profiles of Rose Water and Oil of Rosa Damascena and Rosa Rugosa from Southeast China

Influence of molecular distillation on antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rose essential oils

Comparative Analysis of Volatile Flavor Compounds in Virgin Rapeseed Oil from Different Producing Areas

Characterization of Volatile Compounds of Rosa roxburghii Tratt by Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry, Quantitative Measurements, Odor Activity Value, and Aroma Intensity

Aroma correlation assisted volatilome coupled network analysis strategy to unveil main aroma-active volatiles of Rosa roxburghii

Geographic Differentiation of Essential Oil from Rhizome of Cultivated Atractylodes lancea by Using GC-MS and Chemical Pattern Recognition Analysis

Headspace – Solid phase microextraction vs liquid injection GC-MS analysis of essential oils: Prediction of linear retention indices by multiple linear regression

Screening of Rosemary Essential Oils with Different Phytochemicals for Antioxidant Capacity, Keratinocyte Cytotoxicity, and Anti-Proliferative Activity

Effectiveness of Liquid-Liquid Extraction, Solid Phase Extraction, and Headspace Technique for Determination of Some Volatile Water-Soluble Compounds of Rose Aromatic Water

[Chemical components in essential oils from tender branches and leaves of Rhododendron]

Comparative Analysis of Two Species of Asari Radix Et Rhizoma by Electronic Nose, Headspace GC–MS and Chemometrics

Chemical Composition Analysis and Discrimination of Essential Oils of Artemisia Argyi Folium from Different Germplasm Resources Based on Electronic Nose and GC/MS Combined with Chemometrics

The effect of long‐chain alkanes on flavour release and olfactory characteristics of rose essential oil