Abstract:In cross-border logistics, mainline carriers (MCs) confronting demand uncertainty have to share their information with the overseas regional carrier (RC) via information system or electronic data interchange. However, does the RC or the incumbent MC have incentives to disclose the demand information to a new MC? The new MC competes with the incumbent MC but has no demand information, while the incumbent MC has accumulated big data and known demand uncertainty well. In this paper, we study the supply chain parties’ preferences over information leakage in a system consisting of an incumbent MC, a new MC and an overseas RC. Interestingly, we show that, when there is no information leakage, the new MC’s signal inference dramatically restricts the RC’s pricing flexibility. This induces the RC to disclose the incumbent MC’s information. We also show that, information leakage alters the MCs’ competition and their profits by balancing the RC’s service price and the MCs’ order sizes.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the information leakage issue between Mainline Carriers (MCs) and Regional Carriers (RC) in cross - border logistics supply chains when facing demand uncertainty. Specifically, the research focuses on the motives and behaviors of existing MCs, new - entry MCs, and RC in terms of information sharing and information leakage. The paper explores the following core questions: 1. **Does RC or existing MC have the incentive to disclose demand uncertainty information to new MC?** If there is no information leakage, new MC needs to infer this information based on RC's service price. 2. **What is the impact of new MC's signal inference on RC and existing MC's decisions?** ### Background and Motivation - **Rapid growth of the cross - border logistics market**: Due to the development of cross - border e - commerce, the scale of the cross - border logistics market is expected to increase by $24.1 billion between 2018 and 2022. - **Cooperation and competition**: Major carriers such as DHL, FedEx, and SF Express cooperate with overseas regional carriers (such as UPS) to provide high - quality "door - to - door" services. This cooperation is not only to meet customer needs but also to maintain an advantage in the fierce market competition. - **The need for information sharing**: For example, UPS cooperates with Alibaba Business Logistics (ABL), and ABL provides ERP access and demand information visibility so that UPS can better handle goods shipped from China to the United States. ### Research Questions - **Motives for information leakage**: Do existing MCs and RC have the incentive to disclose demand uncertainty information to new MC? - **Impact of information leakage**: How does information leakage change the competition and profits of MCs, especially in terms of balancing RC's service price and MCs' order volumes? ### Model Setup - **Supply chain structure**: The research includes two competing main carriers (new MC and existing MC) and an overseas regional carrier (RC) that provides regional distribution services. - **Demand uncertainty**: Existing MC has accurate demand forecast information, while new MC lacks this information but can infer demand signals by observing RC's service price. - **Brand image**: New MC may have established a brand image in other service markets, which will affect the uncertainty of its market demand. ### Main Findings - **RC's pricing strategy without information leakage**: RC may set a relatively high service price to signal high market potential, but new MC may ignore this signal, especially when new MC's demand uncertainty is high. - **Impact of information leakage**: Information leakage may reduce the information value of new MC, especially when the demand uncertainty is low. However, if new MC has a good brand image, information leakage may increase its certain profit part. - **Attitudes of existing MC and RC towards information leakage**: Existing MC may benefit from information leakage, especially when new MC's demand uncertainty is moderate. RC always benefits from information leakage because its monopoly advantage in the regional market enables it to influence the competition and cooperation of MCs. ### Conclusion By analyzing the behaviors and profits of all parties in the supply chain in different scenarios, the paper reveals the complex impact of information leakage in cross - border logistics supply chains. The research results show that information leakage may change the competition and cooperation models of all parties in the supply chain, thus affecting their decisions and profits.

Information leakage in a cross-border logistics supply chain considering demand uncertainty and signal inference

Demand Information and Spot Price Information: Supply Chains Trading in Spot Markets

Information Leakage and Supply Chain Contracts

For better or worse: Impacts of information leakage by a common supplier with innovation imitation of downstream firms

Comment on "strategic Information Management under Leakage in a Supply Chain".

The impact of ex-post information sharing on a two-echelon supply chain with horizontal competition and capacity constraint

Comment on 'Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain'

Optimal ordering decision and information leakage preference under asymmetric forecast signal

Analysis of a maritime transport chain with information asymmetry and disruption risk

Logistics mode selection and information sharing in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain with competition

Incentive-Driven Information Dissemination in Two-Tier Supply Chains

Demand information disclosure in competing supply chains with additional service warrant

Retailer Information Sharing with Supplier Encroachment

Agency encroachment and information sharing: cooperation and competition in freight forwarding market

Risk Sharing and Information Revelation Mechanism of a One-Manufacturer and One-Retailer Supply Chain Facing an Integrated Competitor

Information Sharing in a Competitive Supply Chain with Capacity Constraint

The Strategic Peril of Information Sharing in a Vertical-Nash Supply Chain: A Note

Endogenous Information Acquisition and Disclosure of Private Information in a Duopoly

Information Sharing In A Supply Chain With Learning Effect

Price decisions with asymmetric reference effect and information sharing in dual-channel supply chains

Information Sharing Across Multiple Buyers in a Supply Chain.