Long‐term efficacy and safety of erenumab in migraine prevention: Results from a 5‐year, open‐label treatment phase of a randomized clinical trial

Messoud Ashina,Peter J. Goadsby,Uwe Reuter,Stephen Silberstein,David W. Dodick,Fei Xue,Feng Zhang,Gabriel Paiva da Silva Lima,Sunfa Cheng,Daniel D. Mikol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14715
2021-01-20
European Journal of Neurology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Although erenumab has demonstrated significant reduction in migraine frequency and improved quality of life in studies lasting 3‐12 months, little is known about long‐term therapy.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Open‐label, 5‐year treatment phase following a 12‐week, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in adults with episodic migraine. Patients initially received open‐label erenumab 70 mg; increased to 140 mg following a protocol amendment. Efficacy analyses included change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly acute migraine‐specific medication (AMSM) days, and health‐related quality of life.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Of 383 patients enrolled, 250 switched to 140 mg; 215 (56.1%) completed open‐label treatment. Mean (SE) change in MMD from baseline of 8.7 (0.2) days was −5.3 (0.3) days; an average reduction of 62.3% at year 5. Among patients using AMSM at baseline (6.3 [2.8] treatment days), mean change in monthly AMSM days was −4.4 (0.3) days at the end of 5 years. Patient‐reported outcomes indicated stable improvements in disability, headache impact, and migraine‐specific quality of life.</p><p>Exposure‐adjusted patient incidence rates of adverse events were 123.0/100 patient‐years; most frequently nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, and influenza. Serious AEs reported by 49 patients (3.8/100 patient‐years) were mostly single occurrence. Two fatal adverse events were reported. There were no increases in incidence of AEs, SAEs, or AEs leading to treatment discontinuation over 5 years of exposure.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Treatment with erenumab was associated with reductions in migraine frequency and improvements in health‐related quality of life that were maintained for at least 5 years. No new safety signals were observed.</p></section>
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?