Abstract:Purpose This study aims to evaluate the adequacy of climate risk disclosure by providing empirical evidence on whether corporate disclosure meets rising stakeholders' demand for risk disclosure concerning climate change. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on a triangulated approach for collecting data from multiple sources in a longitudinal study, we perform a panel regression analysis on a sample of multinational firms between 2007 and 2021. Inspired by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) principles, our innovative and inclusive model of measuring firm-level climate risks underscores the urgent need to redefine materiality from a broader value creation (rather than only financial) perspective, including the impact on sustainable development. Findings The findings of this study provide evidence of limited corporate climate risk disclosure, indicating that organisations have yet to accept the reality of climate-related risks. An additional finding supports the existence of a nexus between higher corporate environmental disclosure and higher corporate resilience to material financial and environmental risks, rather than pervasive sustainability risk disclosure. Practical implications We argue that a mechanical process for climate-related risk disclosure can limit related disclosure variability, risk reporting priority selection, thereby broadening the short-term perspective on financial materiality assessment for disclosure. Social implications This study extends recent literature on the adequacy of corporate risk disclosure, highlighting the importance of disclosing material sustainability risks from the perspectives of different stakeholder groups for long-term success. Corporate management should place climate-related risks at the centre of their disclosure strategies. We argue that reducing the systematic underestimation of climate-related risks and variations in their disclosure practices may require regulations that enhance corporate perceptions and responses to these risks. Originality/value This study emphasises the importance of reconceptualising materiality from a multidimensional value creation standpoint, encapsulating financial and sustainable development considerations. This novel model of assessing firm-level climate risk, based on the GRI principles, underscores the necessity of developing a more comprehensive approach to evaluating materiality.

The Materiality and Measurement of Physical Climate Risk: Evidence from Form 8-K

Climate Change Exposure and Stock Liquidity Commonality: International Evidence

Climate Risk Materiality and Firm Risk

Firm-specific climate risk and market valuation

The Materiality of Climate Risk

To Disclose or Not to Disclose Climate-Change Risk in Form 10-K: Does Materiality Lie in the Eyes of the Beholder?

Climate Risk Disclosure and Institutional Investors: Evidence from the Insurance Industry

Corporate climate risk disclosure: assessing materiality and stakeholder expectations for sustainable value creation

The impact of climate risk on firm performance and financing choices: An international comparison

Carbon Disclosure, Contextual Factors, and Information Asymmetry: The Case of Physical Risk Reporting

Accounting for Carbon Emissions Among Large U.S. Companies: Does Materiality Matter

Linking physical climate risk with mandatory business risk disclosure requirements

Do climate risk disclosures matter to financial analysts?

Climate change and commercial property markets

Climate Change Exposure and Stock Return Predictability

Corporate Climate Risk: Measurements and Responses

Automated Identification of Climate Risk Disclosures in Annual Corporate Reports

Finance and climate change: assessing the impact of physical, transition, and regulation risks on asset pricing valuation

Management Accounting Research Opportunities in Climate Change Reporting

When attention to climate change matters: The impact of climate risk disclosure on firm market value

On measuring climate risks using attention search and testing the clean energy-climate hypothesis