Abstract:Abstract Introduction Partial thickness (PT) burn injuries are the most common depth of burn seen in the emergency department. While some deep partial thickness injuries will eventually require surgery, the many PT wounds can be successfully managed as an outpatient, given immediate care, education, and supplies. The primary hypothesis was a treat-at-home (TH) strategy, particularly with a surfactant-based dressing (WSD), would result in no greater risk of requiring surgical intervention for PT wounds. Second, we hypothesized there to be a bias toward surgery in the admitted patients. Lastly, a TH strategy results in significant cost savings. Methods This single-center, retrospective study was dual IRB approved and included all patients treated in the burn center emergency department (ED) between May 2019 and May 2023. Patients were excluded for having superficial burns, full-thickness (FT) burns, electrical burn, lack of burn, less than 18 years old, pregnant or incarcerated, or not expected to survive. The years were chosen based on sample size analysis and estimated ED visits. The planned enrollment was designed to fulfill non-inferiority and potential superiority of surfactant-based dressing versus any another TH strategy. Chi-square test was used to determine a difference in number admitted for subsequent surgery. Sigmaplot 15.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results Two-thousand forty-seven patients were screened. After exclusions, 1,458 patients were included in the study group (Figure 1) with two-thirds in the TH group. About half were sent home with WSD vs another dressing (CTL). There were no differences in age, sex, race, medical history, or mechanism of burn. The CTL patients were more likely to be cocaine positive and have a burn involving the head / neck. WSD had larger burns and more likely to have deep PT and extremity burns, and a longer delay from injury. Few in WSD and CTL required subsequent admission for surgery [5 (1.0%) vs 2 (0.4%)]. Although, CTL had significantly more not return for follow up [153 (31.3%) vs 239 (46.7%)]. Patients admitted from the ED were more likely to be older, male, Caucasian, complex medical and social history, inhalation injury, presence of deep PT and larger burns, transfer from another facility, and present with infection. For those admitted, only 36.8% received surgery with a 3 day median time to first operation. The median length of stay for patients not requiring surgery was 1 day. Assuming the presence of social barriers in 1/3 and only considering bed cost, allowing capable patients with PT to treat-at-home would save an estimated annual $3.4 million. Conclusions This is the largest study to evaluate the use of WSD for immediate treatment of PT burns to avoid admission. No matter the choice of home wound treatment, few required subsequent admission for surgery. A TH model could result in millions of dollars of savings. Applicability of Research to Practice A treat-at-home model could save the millions of dollars for patients and hospitals

54 Cost of Dakin’s Solution vs. Mafenide Soaks in Acute Burn Care

Cost Analysis of Pure Hypochlorous Acid Preserved Wound Cleanser versus Mafenide for the Irrigation of Burn Wounds

717 Survival Benefit with a Topical Anti-inflammatory with Antimicrobial Properties in Patients with >15%; TBSA Burns

A cost model case comparison of current versus modern management of burns at a regional hospital in South Africa

Cost Analysis of a Novel Enzymatic Debriding Agent for Management of Burn Wounds

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ENZYMATIC DEBRIDEMENT VERSUS STANDARD BURN CARE: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

607 Cultured Epidermal Autografts versus Spray Keratinocytes for Massive Burns—a Cost Effectiveness Analysis

Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Topical Silver Sulfadiazine and Enclosed Silver Dressing for Partial-Thickness Burn Treatment

83 Outcomes Using Autologous Epidermal Autograft for Wound Closure of Majority Deep Partial Thickness Burns

Xeroform Stick-Down Dressing

Comparative results of autologous skin cell suspension combined with a contact layer dressing versus autologous skin cell suspension and a poly-lactic acid dressing in larger total body surface burns

535 An Analysis of Hospital Cost and Reimbursement for Burn Care : Are We Keeping Up?

91 Comparison of a Polylactic Acid Skin Substitute to Porcine Xenograft for Pediatric Partial Thickness Burns

780 Injury to Intervention: Is There Another Opportunity to Improve Burn Care?

The Use of Polyhexanide and Betaine Combined Preparation in Adult Burn Care in Sri Lanka

Evaluation of Bacterial Cellulose Dressing Versus Vaseline Gauze in Partial Thickness Burn Wounds and Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Two-Center Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

"Minimally Invasive" Skin Grafting With Enzymatic Debridement and Autologous Skin Cell Spray: A Retrospective Case Series

Enzymatic Debridement Compared To Surgical Debridement: A Cost Analysis in a Burn Unit in Spain

121 A Retrospective, Non-inferiority Treat-at-Home Study Utilizing a Surfactant-based Dressing for Partial-thickness Burn Wounds (HOME)

Efficacy and Safety of High Vs Standard Daptomycin Doses Examined in Chinese Patients With Severe Burn Injuries by Pharmacokinetic Evaluation

47 Successful Prevention of Secondary Burn Progressions Using Topical Tacrolimus and Infliximab Hydrogel