Evidence of Inflated Prediction Performance: A Commentary on Machine Learning and Suicide Research

Ross Jacobucci,Andrew K. Littlefield,Alexander J. Millner,Evan M. Kleiman,Douglas Steinley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620954216
2021-01-01
Clinical Psychological Science
Abstract:The use of machine learning is increasing in clinical psychology, yet it is unclear whether these approaches enhance the prediction of clinical outcomes. Several studies show that machine-learning algorithms outperform traditional linear models. However, many studies that have found such an advantage use the same algorithm, random forests with the optimism-corrected bootstrap, for internal validation. Through both a simulation and empirical example, we demonstrate that the pairing of nonlinear, flexible machine-learning approaches, such as random forests with the optimism-corrected bootstrap, provide highly inflated prediction estimates. We find no advantage for properly validated machine-learning models over linear models.
psychiatry,psychology, clinical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?