Risk indicators in families with abused children and young people: scoping review
Aida de Jesus Correia Simões,Maria da Saudade Lopes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1896244
IF: 5.348
2021-04-01
Annals of Medicine
Abstract:The promotion of rights and the protection of children implies involvement between state agencies and families in the evaluation processes, having developed in the child Welfare systems Internationally [1–3 Morris K. Thinking family? The complexities for family engagement in care and protection. Br J Social Work. 2012;42(5):906–920. Morris K, Connolly M. Family decision making in child welfare: challenges in developing a knowledge base for practice. Child Abuse Rev. 2012;21(1):41–52. Schreiber J, Fuller T, Paceley M. Engagement in child protective services: parent perceptions of worker skills. Children Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35(4):707–715.]. Although effective involvement is an essential component of the Help process [4 Loman AL, Siegel GL. Neglect effects of approach and services under differential response on long term child safety and welfare. Child Abuse Neglect. 2015;39:86–97.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]], it presents continuous challenges for Professionals [5 Fusco R. Second-generation mothers in the child welfare system: factors that predict involvement. Child Adolesc Soc Work J. 2015;32(6):545–554.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. There is also an underlying tension between the regulatory role inherent in the protection system and the importance of involvement and contribution to develop the capacities of families producing better outcomes for children [6 Thrana HM, Fauske H. The emotional encounter with child welfare services: the importance of incorporating the emotional perspective in parents' encounters with child welfare workers. Eur J Social Work. 2014;17(2):221–236.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]]. It is a challenge for families and professionals to deal with the duality of the relationship, given the expectations that workers engage in conflicting roles of supporting families, on the one hand, and ensuring the safety of children, on the other, having the authority and The mandate to remove children when necessary causes a level of mistrust that interposes in interactions [7 Toros K, LaSala M. Estonian child protection workers' assessment perspectives: the need for competence and confidence. Int Social Work. 2018;61(1):93–
medicine, general & internal