Self-Nomination in the Identification Process of Gifted and Talented Students in Mexico

María Alicia Zavala Berbena,Gabriela de la Torre García

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_24

2021-01-01

Abstract:In the Asia-Pacific Rim countries, it seems that self-nomination is a common practice when identifying gifted and talented students. Several authors are in favour of this practice, arguing that it is important that students have an active role in their educational process. Self-nomination may also contribute to the necessity of having new tools that broaden the screening process, showing strengths and weaknesses of gifted students beyond unidimensional intelligence tests. Although self-nomination have been used since the 1970s, to date there is little research on its efficacy and no clear methodology on how it can be implemented. In this chapter, self-nomination is analysed as part of a multidimensional and inclusive approach to the identification of diversely gifted and talented students. In addition, different types of self-nomination are analysed and categorised, such as interviews, questionnaires, autobiographies, self-evaluation scales and products. The aim is to distinguish the instruments and determine how to implement them within an identification process in order to make better use of them. Likewise, an overview is presented of specialised literature on advantages and disadvantages of self-nominations. The goal of this exercise is to understand the benefit of their use and their limitations. It also presents a Mexican experience of developing and validating an inventory for self-nomination of adolescents. This instrument is based on students’ self-perceptions of performance in seven areas. The specific purpose of the trial was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Self Nomination Inventory for Gifted and Talented Adolescents in a Mexican adolescent sample, so full results of the participant self-perceptions are not reported. However, in order to move forward with the inventory’s convergent validation, a comparison was made between the results from the self-nominated students and their teachers’ nominations. Some findings were indicated, that is, 55.4% of the students were confirmed by their teachers in their respective areas of talent, with the athletic and artistic areas being superior at close to 60%. The initial results suggested that the self-nomination inventory may be a useful instrument to support the identification process of diversely gifted and talented student participants in the screening phase of this Mexican study. Finally, recommendations for research and an effective application of self-nomination strategies in educational practices are provided.