Molecular markers of telomere dysfunction and senescence are common findings in the usual interstitial pneumonia pattern of lung fibrosis

Joyce S Lee,Janet La,Sara Aziz,Evgenia Dobrinskikh,Robert Brownell,Kirk D Jones,Natalia Achtar‐Zadeh,Gary Green,Brett M Elicker,Jeffrey A Golden,Michael A Matthay,Jasleen Kukreja,David A Schwartz,Paul J Wolters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14334
2021-04-14
Histopathology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a genetically‐mediated, age‐associated, progressive form of pulmonary fibrosis characterized pathologically by a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of fibrosis. The UIP pattern is also found in pulmonary fibrosis attributable to clinical diagnoses other than IPF (Non‐IPF UIP) whose clinical course is similarly poor, suggesting common molecular drivers.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>To test whether patients with IPF and non‐IPF UIP share molecular drivers, lung tissue from 169 IPF patients and 57 non‐IPF UIP patients were histopathologically and molecularly compared.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Histopathologic changes in both IPF and non‐IPF UIP patients included temporal heterogeneity, microscopic honeycombing, fibroblast foci and dense collagen fibrosis. Non‐IPF UIP lungs were more likely to have lymphocytic infiltration, noncaseating granulomas, airway centered inflammation or small airways disease. Telomeres were shorter in alveolar type II (AECII) cells of both IPF and non‐IPF UIP lungs compared to age‐similar, unused donor, controls. Molecular markers of senescence (p16, p21) were elevated in lysates of IPF and non‐IPF UIP lungs. Immunostaining localized expression of these proteins to AECII cells. The <i>MUC5B</i> promoter variant minor allele frequency was similar between IPF and non‐IPF UIP patients and MUC5B protein expression was similar in IPF and non‐IPF UIP lungs. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Molecular markers of telomere dysfunction and senescence are pathologically expressed in both IPF and non‐IPF UIP lungs. These findings suggest that common molecular drivers may contribute to the pathogenesis of UIP‐associated pulmonary fibrosis, regardless of the clinical diagnosis.</p></section>
pathology,cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?