Abstract:Introduction: The discourse on immigration and immigrants is central to contemporary political and public discussions. Analyzing online conversations about immigrants provides valuable insights into public opinion, complemented by data from questionnaires on how attitudes are formed. Methods: The research includes two studies examining the expressive and informational use of social media. Study 1 conducted a computational text analysis of comments on Singaporean Facebook pages and forums, focusing on how social media is used to discuss immigrants. Study 2 utilized survey data to examine the use of social media at the individual level, testing the relationships between cognitive ability, perceptions of threat, negative emotions towards immigrants, and social media usage within the Integrated Threat Theory framework. Results: Study 1 found that discussions about immigrants on social media often involved negative emotions and concerns about economic impact, such as competition for jobs and crime. Complementing these findings about perceived economic threats, Study 2 showed that individuals with higher social media usage and greater perceptions of threat were more likely to have negative emotions towards immigrants. These relationships were mediated by perceptions of threat and were stronger in individuals with lower cognitive abilities. Discussion: The findings from both studies demonstrate the role of social media in shaping public attitudes towards immigrants, highlighting how perceived threats influence these attitudes. This research suggests the importance of considering how digital platforms contribute to public opinion on immigration, with implications for understanding the dynamics of attitude formation in the digital age.

Narratives Shape Cognitive Representations of Immigrants and Immigration-Policy Preferences

A Test of Interactive Narrative as a Tool Against Prejudice

Intervening in Anti-Immigrant Sentiments: The Causal Effects of Factual Information on Attitudes toward Immigration

Immigration Threat, Partisanship, and Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the US, UK, and Germany

Negative media portrayals of immigrants increase ingroup favoritism and hostile physiological and emotional reactions

Moral typecasting explains evaluations of undocumented immigrants

Immigration documentation statuses evoke racialized faceism in mental representations

Media Frames and Images of Chinese Immigrants: Analyzing European Newspaper Narratives from 2015 to 2022

The Language of Immigration Coverage: The Arizona Republic and Media's Role in the Production of Social Illegality

Immigrants As Symbolic Assailants

Mass Media and Concerns about Immigration in Germany in the 21st Century: Individual-Level Evidence over 15 Years

Immigration, Collective Efficacy, Social Ties, and Violence: Unpacking the Mediating Mechanisms in Immigration Effects on Neighborhood-Level Violence

Does Immigration Undermine Public Support for Social Policy?

Immigration Debated: Central African Immigrant Youth’s Discourses of Fairness and Civic Belonging in the United States

Social media and anti-immigrant prejudice: a multi-method analysis of the role of social media use, threat perceptions, and cognitive ability

Characterization of Local Attitudes Toward Immigration Using Social Media

Computational analysis of 140 years of US political speeches reveals more positive but increasingly polarized framing of immigration

Immigration and Crimes Against Natives: The 2015 Refugee Crisis in Germany

Coverage of a Crisis: The Effects of International News Portrayals of Refugees and Misuse of the Term “Immigrant”

The complexity and ambivalence of immigration attitudes: Ambivalent stereotypes predict conflicting attitudes toward immigration policies.

Legislation, Linguistics, and Location: Exploring Attitudes on Unauthorized Immigration