Abstract:Abstract Objectives To synthesise research investigating data and code sharing in medicine and health to establish an accurate representation of the prevalence of sharing, how this frequency has changed over time, and what factors influence availability. Design Systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data. Data sources Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and the preprint servers medRxiv, bioRxiv, and MetaArXiv were searched from inception to 1 July 2021. Forward citation searches were also performed on 30 August 2022. Review methods Meta-research studies that investigated data or code sharing across a sample of scientific articles presenting original medical and health research were identified. Two authors screened records, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted summary data from study reports when individual participant data could not be retrieved. Key outcomes of interest were the prevalence of statements that declared that data or code were publicly or privately available (declared availability) and the success rates of retrieving these products (actual availability). The associations between data and code availability and several factors (eg, journal policy, type of data, trial design, and human participants) were also examined. A two stage approach to meta-analysis of individual participant data was performed, with proportions and risk ratios pooled with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis. Results The review included 105 meta-research studies examining 2 121 580 articles across 31 specialties. Eligible studies examined a median of 195 primary articles (interquartile range 113-475), with a median publication year of 2015 (interquartile range 2012-2018). Only eight studies (8%) were classified as having a low risk of bias. Meta-analyses showed a prevalence of declared and actual public data availability of 8% (95% confidence interval 5% to 11%) and 2% (1% to 3%), respectively, between 2016 and 2021. For public code sharing, both the prevalence of declared and actual availability were estimated to be <0.5% since 2016. Meta-regressions indicated that only declared public data sharing prevalence estimates have increased over time. Compliance with mandatory data sharing policies ranged from 0% to 100% across journals and varied by type of data. In contrast, success in privately obtaining data and code from authors historically ranged between 0% and 37% and 0% and 23%, respectively. Conclusions The review found that public code sharing was persistently low across medical research. Declarations of data sharing were also low, increasing over time, but did not always correspond to actual sharing of data. The effectiveness of mandatory data sharing policies varied substantially by journal and type of data, a finding that might be informative for policy makers when designing policies and allocating resources to audit compliance. Systematic review registration Open Science Framework doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/7SX8U .

Open data and data sharing in articles about COVID-19 published in preprint servers medRxiv and bioRxiv

Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data

COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study

Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements

Data sharing practices across knowledge domains: A dynamic examination of data availability statements in PLOS ONE publications

How do we share data in COVID-19 research? A systematic review of COVID-19 datasets in PubMed Central Articles

An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations

The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape

Open science and conflict of interest policies of medical and health sciences journals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A repeat cross-sectional study

Questionable practices in data and code sharing policy in high-profile medical journal and research

Mobilisation and analyses of publicly available SARS-CoV-2 data for pandemic responses

Data sharing policies across health research globally: Cross‐sectional meta‐research study

Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines

Data sharing practices in open access mode: a study of the willingness to share data in different disciplines

Evaluation of Data Sharing After Implementation of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Data Sharing Statement Requirement

The Impact of Preprints on COVID-19 Research Dissemination: A Quantitative Analysis of Journal Publications

Data sharing and transparency indicators in published RCTs in Oral Health between 2017 and 2023

Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic

Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility: evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal Cognition

COVID-19-Related manuscripts: lag from preprint to publication

Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic