Abstract:This study investigated the impact of the June 2015 geomagnetic storms on the Brazilian equatorial and low-latitude ionosphere by analyzing various data sources, including solar wind parameters from the advanced compositional explorer satellite (ACE), global positioning satellite vertical total electron content (GPS-VTEC), geomagnetic data, and validation of the SAMI2 model-VTEC with GPS-VTEC. The effect of geomagnetic disturbances on the Brazilian longitudinal sector was examined by applying multiresolution analysis (MRA) of the maximum overlap discrete wavelet transform (MODWT) to isolate the diurnal component of the disturbance dynamo (Ddyn), DP2 current fluctuations from the ionospheric electric current disturbance (Diono), and semblance cross-correlation wavelet analysis for local phase comparison between the Sq and Diono currents. Our findings revealed that the significant fluctuations in DP2 at the Brazilian equatorial stations (Belem, dip lat: −0.47° and Alta Floresta, dip lat: −3.75°) were influenced by IMF Bz oscillations; the equatorial electrojet also fluctuated in tandem with the DP2 currents, and dayside reconnection generated the field-aligned current that drove the DP2 current system. The short-lived positive ionospheric storm during the main phase on 22 June in the Southern Hemisphere in the Brazilian sector was caused by the interplay between the eastward prompt penetration of the magnetospheric convection electric field and the westward disturbance dynamo electric field. The negative ionospheric storms that occurred during the recovery phase from 23 to 29 June 2015, were attributed to the westward disturbance dynamo electric field, which caused the downward E × B drift of the plasma to a lower height with a high recombination rate. The comparison between the SAMI2 model-VTEC and GPS-VTEC indicates that the SAMI2 model underestimated the VTEC within magnetic latitudes of −9° to −24° in the Brazilian longitudinal sector from 6 to 17 June 2015. However, it demonstrated satisfactory agreement with the GPS-VTEC within magnetic latitudes of −9° to 10° from 8 to 15 June 2015. Conversely, the SAMI2 model overestimated the VTEC between ±10° magnetic latitudes from 16 to 28 June 2015. The most substantial root mean square error (RMSE) values, notably 10.30 and 5.48 TECU, were recorded on 22 and 23 June 2015, coinciding with periods of intense geomagnetic disturbance.

Can Geomagnetic Storms Affect Stratospheric O3 and NOx in the South Atlantic Anomaly Zone?

Ionospheric–Thermospheric Responses in South America to the August 2018 Geomagnetic Storm Based on Multiple Observations

Geomagnetic Impact on Upper Atmospheric Nitric Oxide

Positive Ionospheric Storm Effects at Latin America Longitude During the Superstorm of 20–22 November 2003: Revisit

Study and Modelling of the Impact of June 2015 Geomagnetic Storms on the Brazilian Ionosphere

Vertical Variations in Thermospheric O/N 2 and the Relationship Between O and N 2 Perturbations During a Geomagnetic Storm

Long‐lasting Negative Ionospheric Storm Effects in Low and Middle Latitudes During the Recovery Phase of the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Different Effects of a Super Storm on Atmospheric Electric Fields at Different Latitudes

Energetic particle induced intra-seasonal variability of ozone inside the Antarctic polar vortex observed in satellite data

The Influence of Sudden Stratospheric Warming on the Development of Ionospheric Storms: The Alma-Ata Ground-Based Ionosonde Observations

Wind and Temperature Effects on Thermosphere Mass Density Response to the November 2004 Geomagnetic Storm

Overcooling in the Upper Thermosphere During the Recovery Phase of the 2003 October Storms

Response of NO 5.3 μm Emission to the Geomagnetic Storm on 24 April 2023

The changing stratosphere

Can the Madden‐Julian oscillation affect the Antarctic total column ozone?

A Simulation Study of the Equatorial Ionospheric Response to the October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Stratospheric NOx enhancements in the Southern Hemisphere Vortex in winter/spring of 2000

Significant Midlatitude Bubble‐Like Ionospheric Super‐Depletion Structure (BLISS) and Dynamic Variation of Storm‐Enhanced Density Plume During the 23 April 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

Ionospheric Response to the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms: Common Features

Stratospheric ozone: Impact of human activity

The Anomalous 2019 Antarctic Ozone Hole in the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System With MLS Observations