Incidence and risk factors of deep vein thrombosis after extracorporeal life support

Olivier Minnen,Walter M. Bergh,Joep M. Droogh,Lisette Koehorst,Wim K. Lagrand,S. Jorinde Raasveld,Annemieke Oude Lansink‐Hartgring,Aart Terpstra,Jasper M. Smit,Pieter R. Tuinman,Alexander P. J. Vlaar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14271
2022-04-29
Artificial Organs
Abstract:BackgroundDeep vein thrombosis (DVT) after decannulation of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is not uncommon. Moreover, the impact of anticoagulation and potential risk factors is unclear. Furthermore, it is unclear if cannula‐associated DVT is more common in ECLS patients compared to critically ill patients without ECLS.MethodsAll adult patients who were successfully weaned from ECLS and were screened for DVT following decannulation were included in this observational cohort study. The incidence of post‐ECLS‐DVT was assessed and cannula‐associated DVT rate was compared with that of patients without ECLS after central venous catheter (CVC) removal. The correlation between level of anticoagulation, risk factors and post‐ECLS‐DVT was determined.ResultsWe included 30 ECLS patients and 53 non‐ECLS patients. DVT was found in 15 patients (50%) of which 10 patients had a DVT in a cannulated vein. No correlation between level of anticoagulation and DVT was found. V‐V ECLS mode was the only independent risk factor for post‐ECLS‐DVT (OR 5.5; 95%CI 1.16‐26.41). We found no difference between the ECLS and non‐ECLS cohort regarding cannula‐associated DVT rate (33% vs 32%).ConclusionPost‐ECLS‐DVT is a common finding that occurs in half of all patients supported with ECLS. The incidence of cannula‐associated DVT was equal to CVC‐associated DVT in critically ill patients without ECLS. V‐V ECLS was an independent risk factor for post‐ECLS‐DVT.
engineering, biomedical,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?