Effects of complex training compared to resistance training alone on physical fitness of healthy individuals: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Rohit K. Thapa Hüseyin Şahin Uysal Filipe Manuel Clemente José Afonso Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo a Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences,Symbiosis International (Deemed University),Pune,Indiab Department of Physical Education and Sports Education,Faculty of Sports Sciences,Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University,Burdur,Turkeyc Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer,Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo,Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares,Viana do Castelo,Portugald Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center,Viana do Castelo,Portugale Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport,Gdańsk,Polandf Centre of Research,Education,Innovation,and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D),Faculty of Sport,University of Porto,Porto,Portugalg Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences Institute,School of Physical Therapy. Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences,Universidad Andres Bello,Santiago,Chile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2391657
IF: 3.9428
2024-08-22
Journal of Sports Sciences
Abstract:Combining traditional resistance and ballistic exercises in a complex training (CT) format has shown improved physical fitness compared to the control conditions. However, no meta-analysis has directly compared CT with traditional resistance training (RT) alone. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and WoS. Thirty-two studies involving 726 participants were included. Both RT and CT similarly improved one-repetition maximum (1RM) squat and bench press, 10 m and 30–60 m linear sprint time, squat jump height, jump power, reactive strength index, and standing long jump distance. Compared to RT, CT favoured 5-m (ES = 0.96) and 20-m linear sprint (ES = 0.52), change-of-direction speed (CODS; ES = 0.39), and countermovement jump height (CMJ; ES = 0.36). Furthermore, moderating effects of training frequency, duration, and complex training type were reported. Certainty of evidence was considered low for 5-m and 20-m linear sprints and CODS and very low for other outcomes. Compared to traditional resistance training, complex training may improve 5-m and 20-m linear sprints, CODS, and CMJ height. The effects of complex training may be optimised by longer interventions (≥7 weeks), with ~ 3 weekly training sessions, and using ascending and contrast training formats. However, the certainty of evidence ranges from very low to low.
sport sciences