Abstract:Abstract Animals can amplify the mechanical power output of their muscles as they jump to escape predators or strike to capture prey. One mechanism for amplification involves muscle–tendon unit (MT) systems in which a spring element (series elastic element [SEE]) is pre-stretched while held in place by a “latch” that prevents immediate transmission of muscle (or contractile element, CE) power to the load. In principle, this storage phase is followed by a triggered release of the latch, and elastic energy released from the SEE enables power amplification (PRATIO=PLOAD/PCE,max >1.0), whereby the peak power delivered from MT to the load exceeds the maximum power limit of the CE in isolation. Latches enable power amplification by increasing the muscle work generated during storage and reducing the duration over which that stored energy is released to power a movement. Previously described biological “latches” include: skeletal levers, anatomical triggers, accessory appendages, and even antagonist muscles. In fact, many species that rely on high-powered movements also have a large number of muscles arranged in antagonist pairs. Here, we examine whether a decaying antagonist force (e.g., from a muscle) could be useful as an active latch to achieve controlled energy transmission and modulate peak output power. We developed a computer model of a frog hindlimb driven by a compliant MT. We simulated MT power generated against an inertial load in the presence of an antagonist force “latch” (AFL) with relaxation time varying from very fast (10 ms) to very slow (1000 ms) to mirror physiological ranges of antagonist muscle. The fastest AFL produced power amplification (PRATIO=5.0) while the slowest AFL produced power attenuation (PRATIO=0.43). Notably, AFLs with relaxation times shorter than ∼300 ms also yielded greater power amplification (PRATIO>1.20) than the system driving the same inertial load using only an agonist MT without any AFL. Thus, animals that utilize a sufficiently fast relaxing AFL ought to be capable of achieving greater power output than systems confined to a single agonist MT tuned for maximum PRATIO against the same load.

Nonlinear elasticity and damping govern ultrafast dynamics in click beetles

Latching of the click beetle (Coleoptera: Elateridae) thoracic hinge enabled by the morphology and mechanics of conformal structures

Pop! Observing and Modeling the Legless Self-righting Jumping Mechanism of Click Beetles

Functional Morphology of the Thorax of the Click Beetle Campsosternus auratus (Coleoptera, Elateridae), with an Emphasis on Its Jumping Mechanism

Why are there no long distance jumpers among click-beetles (Elateridae)?

Insect-scale jumping robots enabled by a dynamic buckling cascade

Reversible kink instability drives ultrafast jumping in nematodes and soft robots

The Functions of Phasic Wing-Tip Folding on Flapping-Wing Aerodynamics

A rapid-response soft end effector inspired by the hummingbird beak

Control of Beam’s Snapback Responses Using Multiple Flexoelectric Actuators

The mechanics of elastic loading and recoil in anuran jumping

Leveraging Bioinspired Structural Constraints for Tunable and Programmable Snapping Dynamics in High‐Speed Soft Actuators

The jumping mechanism of flea beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Alticini), its application to bionics and preliminary design for a robotic jumping leg

Time-scale mechanical behaviors of locust semi-lunar process cuticles under power amplification for rapid movements.

Dynamics of Snapping Beams and Jumping Poppers

Size-scaling limits of impulsive elastic energy release from a resilin-like elastomer

Initial test of the passive jumping mechanism based on the jumping principle of click beetles

Evaluation of linear and non-linear activation dynamics models for insect muscle

Hurry Up and Get Out of the Way! Exploring the Limits of Muscle-Based Latch Systems for Power Amplification

Inside the coupling of ladybird beetle elytra: elastic setae can facilitate swift deployment

Instantaneous kinematic phase reflects neuromechanical response to lateral perturbations of running cockroaches