Abstract:Identifying critical safety management drivers with high driver-level risks is essential for traffic safety improvement. Previous studies commonly evaluated driver-level risks based upon aggregated statistical characteristics (e.g., driving exposure and driving behavior), which were obtained from long-period driving monitoring data. However, given the great advancements of the connected vehicle and in-vehicle data instrumentation technologies, there has been a notable increase in the collection of short-period driving data, which has emerged as a prominent data source for analysis. In this data environment, traditionally employed aggregated behavior characteristics are unstable due to the time-varying feature of driving behavior coupled with insufficient data sampling periods. Thus, traditional modeling methods based upon aggregated statistical characteristics are no longer feasible. Instead of utilizing such unreliable statistical information to represent driver-level risks, this study employed temporal variation characteristics of driving behavior to identify critical safety management drivers in the short-period driving data environment. Specifically, the relationships between driving behavior temporal variation characteristics and individual crash occurrence probability were developed. To eliminate the impacts of drivers' driving behavior heterogeneity on model performance, "traffic entropy" index that could quantify the abnormal degrees of driving behavior was proposed. Deep learning models including convolutional neural network (CNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) were employed to conduct the temporal variation feature mining. Empirical analyses were conducted using data obtained from online ride-hailing services. Experiment results showed that temporal variation characteristics based models outperformed traditional aggregated statistical characteristics based models. The area under the curve (AUC) index was improved by 4.1%. And the proposed traffic entropy index further enhanced the model performance by 5.3%. The best model achieved an AUC of 0.754, comparable to existing approaches utilizing long-period driving data. Finally, applications of the proposed method in driver management program development and its further investigations have been discussed.

Research on risky driving behavior evaluation model based on CIDAS real data

Driving risk assessment based on naturalistic driving study and driver attitude questionnaire analysis

Study on Evaluation Models of Highway Safety Based on Catastrophe Theory

A Multimodal Data-Driven Approach for Driving Risk Assessment

Investigating the features of risky driving behaviors on expressway diverge area based on conflict and modeling analysis

Road Traffic Safety Risk Estimation Method Based on Vehicle Onboard Diagnostic Data

Critical safety management driver identification based upon temporal variation characteristics of driving behavior

Evaluating Driving Styles by Normalizing Driving Behavior Based on Personalized Driver Modeling

Driving Risk Evaluation Based on Multidimensional Data

A Method for Vehicle Collision Risk Assessment through Inferring Driver's Braking Actions in Near-Crash Situations

Driving risk assessment using near-crash database through data mining of tree-based model

Safety evaluation model of urban cross-river tunnel based on driving simulation

Study of Correlation between Driver Emergency Measures and Pedestrian Injury Based on Combined Driving Simulator and Computer Simulation

A Model of Beijing Drivers' Scrambling Behaviors

Crash Risks Evaluation of Urban Expressways: A Case Study in Shanghai

Factors Causing Aberrant Driving Behaviors: A Model of Problem Drivers in China

Longitudinal risky driving behavior recognition based on naturalistic driving study

Exploratory analysis of injury severity under different levels of driving automation (SAE Level 2-5) using multi-source data

Research on driving behavior decision making system of autonomous driving vehicle based on benefit evaluation model

Exploratory analysis of injury severity under different levels of driving automation (SAE Levels 2 and 4) using multi-source data

Model Of Driver Accident And Its Application