Abstract:Whether and how people regulate their negative emotions matters a great deal. However, it is not yet clear why people regulate as they do. One promising idea is that people's beliefs shape their emotion regulation choices, and initial evidence indicates that individuals' dispositional beliefs about emotions are indeed associated with general patterns of emotion regulation. The present study extends prior work on emotion beliefs to better understand how occurrent (i.e., momentary) beliefs about helpfulness, controllability, and justification of specific emotions shape whether and how people regulate negative emotions in everyday life. Participants (N = 143; U.S. community college students recruited in 2022; 76% female; age = 18-60) completed a 7-day experience-sampling protocol in which they were pinged three times per day to describe their most recent negative experiences and answer questions about their emotions, occurrent beliefs about emotions, and emotion regulation. With respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation in everyday life.respect to whether people regulate their emotions, results reveal that people regulate their emotions more when they perceive them to be less helpful. Exploratory analyses additionally show that people regulate negative emotions more when they perceive them to be more controllable and when emotional intensity is relatively high. In terms of how people regulate their emotions, people are more likely to use reappraisal when emotions are seen as more helpful, more controllable, and less justified; and more likely to use distraction when emotions are seen as less helpful and more justified. These findings contribute to a more fine-grained understanding of how beliefs shape emotion regulation (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation in College Athletes: A Preliminary Exploration of Daily Savoring, Acceptance, and Cognitive Reappraisal

Athletes' basic psychological needs and emotions: the role of cognitive reappraisal

Back to basics: A naturalistic assessment of the experience and regulation of emotion.

Regulating positive emotions: Implications for promoting well-being in individuals with depression.

Relationship Between Personality Traits and Emotion Regulation Among Adolescent Athletes

Emotion regulation strategies in daily life: mindfulness, cognitive reappraisal and emotion suppression

Culture, emotion, and cognition: Understanding the psychological dynamics of Chinese sports with emotional regulation skills and cognitive reappraisal

Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective.

If it Ain't Broke, Don't Fix it: Positive Versus Negative Emotion Regulation in Daily Life and Depressive Symptoms

Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals

The indirect effects of perfectionism on athletes' self-views through maladaptive emotion regulation

The Socialization of Positive Emotions: Implications for Physical Health and Psychological Adjustment

Whether and how to regulate: Emotion regulation in negative-feedback situations.

Trait and Daily Emotion Regulation in Social Anxiety Disorder

Emotion Regulation and the Experience of Future Negative Mood: The Importance of Assessing Social Support

Regulation of negative affect in schizophrenia: the effectiveness of acceptance versus reappraisal and suppression

Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Occurrent beliefs about emotions predict emotion regulation in everyday life.

Review: Defining Positive Emotion Dysregulation: Integrating Temperamental and Clinical Perspectives

Positive Emotion Is Associated with Attentional Focus on Physical Activity and Eating in Adolescents: A Daily Diary Study

Rethinking Feelings: An fMRI Study of the Cognitive Regulation of Emotion