Abstract:<header class="article-table-caption"><span class="table-caption__label">Table 1. </span>Advantages and disadvantages of different methods of data collection </header><table class="table article-section__table"><thead><tr><th class="bottom-bordered-cell right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Data collection method</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell center-aligned">Pros</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell center-aligned">Cons</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Focus groups: Small groups of four to eight people (numbers can vary) discussing a topic. The moderator may be the researcher or a professional moderator. A set of open‐ended questions and/or follow‐up prompts are generally used to guide discussion and ensure consistency between focus groups, but interaction and exploring different conversational directions are encouraged. Focus groups are generally audio or video recorded and transcribed verbatim. A note‐taker may also be present alongside the moderator to record where people are sitting, observe who is speaking and/or any non‐verbal reactions</td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Can be an efficient way to collect data from multiple people</li><li>Can generate richer data as participants interact with one another and build on each other's comments</li><li>Can feel like a safer space to share information if the participants are comfortable with one another</li></ul></td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Can be difficult to coordinate a suitable time and place for everyone</li><li>If the participants are imbalanced in authority (ie managers and staff), some participants may not be comfortable providing an honest opinion</li><li>If there are dominating personalities, quieter people may not have a chance to speak</li><li>Difficult to arrange and conduct remotely</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td class="right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Interviews: One‐on‐one or small group interviews prioritise discussion between the interviewer/researcher and the interviewee/s. Interviews may be open, semi‐structured (following a loose question guide), or structured (following a strict guide, like a survey conducted face‐to‐face). Question guides may be changed over time as more interviews are conducted and new ideas or issues emerge. Interviews can be held in person, or remotely by phone or video conferencing. They are generally recorded and transcribed</td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Suitable for discussions of sensitive or difficult topics</li><li>Very rich data on personal experiences</li><li>Scheduling more flexible</li></ul></td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Takes longer to collect data from sufficient participants</li><li>More expensive and time‐consuming to transcribe and analyse</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td class="right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Observations: Observational field notes or video recordings may be used to understand how a behaviour occurs or how people interact in a natural setting. These may be combined with quantitative methods to triangulate the data collection</td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Helpful to understand how something happens in real life; not reliant on opinion</li><li>Reduces the influence of the researcher if conducted subtly and repeatedly over time</li></ul></td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>If multiple observers are used, clear guidance is required to ensure comparable data are recorded</li><li>Can take a long time to collect</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td class="right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Review of written materials: In some cases, existing data may be used alone or to supplement primary data. These may include free text responses in surveys, social media posts, transcripts of discussions or interviews conducted for another purpose, field or case notes, newspaper articles, or other pieces of writing</td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>The researcher's influence is reduced or negligible, depending on the data source</li><li>Views may be more freely expressed outside the context of a research study (e.g. social media)</li></ul></td><td class="left-aligned"><ul class="unordered-list"><li>Ethical considerations may arise with regard to data collected for another purpose</li><li>Important to ensure that the data sources are public or their use is cleared by an ethics review board</li><li>Depending on the materials, may not directly answer the research question</li></ul></td></tr></tbody></table>

A Concise Review on Qualitative Research in Dentistry

Qualitative research in dental traumatology—A narrative review

An introduction to qualitative research for resident doctors

An Introductory Guide to Survey Research

Experiences of dental behaviour support techniques: A qualitative systematic review

An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research

Qualitative Research in Healthcare: Data Analysis

How to use qualitative methods for health and health services research

Qualitative Research in Surgical Disciplines: Need and Scope

Structure equation modeling in oral health research: A review of applications and considerations

Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research

Evidence in Orthodontics related to qualitative research

Challenges in conducting clinical research in primary care dentistry

Qualitative research Sampling

How to Conduct and Publish Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses in Dentistry

The qualitative research interview

A phenomenological study on East and Southeast Asian dental educators: perceived importance, challenges, and strategies in teaching dental materials science

A Bibliometric Mapping Study of the Literature on Oral Health-related Quality of Life

The phenomenological approach in dentistry - a narrative review

Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis

A Qualitative Review on Research Methodology: An Overview